From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KyongHo Cho Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] iommu/exynos: Add IOMMU/System MMU driver for Samsung Exynos Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:45:43 +0900 Message-ID: References: <001801ccf5e3$69d79860$3d86c920$%cho@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Kyungmin Park Cc: linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Subash Patel , Younglak Kim , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Kukjin Kim , Sanghyun Lee , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Hi, > > Some comments. > 1. It's not same patch series. since it has additional feature, > exynos5 series support which don't covered at previous time. > 2. It assumes that name conversion is based on exynos5 as default. now > you use gsc at exynos4 even though there's no gsc block. It should be > fimc. Thanks. I agree about the second and applied it in the next patchset. > > So I suggest to send exynos4 series patch as before and send > additional exynos5 patch series next. > I will just extract a new patch that removes existing system MMU driver from the previous 2 patches and the patchset will consist of 3 patches.