From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] iommu: Move over to unsigned int domain type Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:26:31 +0900 Message-ID: References: <149501695257.25282.12037681018061688033.sendpatchset@little-apple> <20170517131853.GC1912@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170517131853.GC1912-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Will Deacon , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Joerg, On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 07:29:12PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: >> From: Magnus Damm >> >> Checkpatch dislikes the type unsigned, so update the iommu >> domain type and consumers to use unsigned int to reduce noise. > > And I hate stupid checkpatch warnings and refuse to fix them. This > clearly is one. Gotcha, fine by me! Let me know if there is anything more non-cosmetic in the IOMMU subsystem that you think would be more useful to spend cycles on. Cheers, / magnus