From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
To: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>,
a.hindborg@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org
Cc: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS DEVICE DRIVER API [RUST]"
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:26:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8REH728BFP1.2BGE9DTRP2IPU@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326201230.3193329-3-abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
On Wed Mar 26, 2025 at 9:11 PM CET, Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
> As suggested by Andreas Hindborg, we could do better here by
> having the macros return `Result`, so that we don't have to wrap
> these calls in a closure for validation which is confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/dma.rs | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> samples/rust/rust_dma.rs | 21 ++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> index d3f448868457..24a6f10370c4 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> @@ -328,20 +328,22 @@ unsafe impl<T: AsBytes + FromBytes + Send> Send for CoherentAllocation<T> {}
> #[macro_export]
> macro_rules! dma_read {
> ($dma:expr, $idx: expr, $($field:tt)*) => {{
> - let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
> - // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
> - // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
> - // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
> - unsafe {
> - let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of!((*item) $($field)*);
> - $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_read(&$dma, ptr_field)
> - }
> + (|| -> Result<_> {
Please use `::core::result::Result<_, _>` instead. If someone uses this
macro in a place with a different `Result` than the one from the kernel
crate, then this will result in a compile error. (also in the instances
below)
You might want to use `::core::result::Result<_, $crate::error::Error>`
instead though if the type inference can't figure out the error type.
> + let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
> + // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
> + // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
> + // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
> + unsafe {
> + let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of!((*item) $($field)*);
> + ::core::result::Result::Ok($crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_read(&$dma, ptr_field))
> + }
> + })()
> }};
> ($dma:ident [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)* ) => {
> - $crate::dma_read!($dma, $idx, $($field)*);
> + $crate::dma_read!($dma, $idx, $($field)*)
> };
> ($($dma:ident).* [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)* ) => {
> - $crate::dma_read!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*);
> + $crate::dma_read!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*)
> };
> }
>
> diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> index 908acd34b8db..cc09d49f2056 100644
> --- a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> +++ b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> @@ -54,13 +54,9 @@ fn probe(pdev: &mut pci::Device, _info: &Self::IdInfo) -> Result<Pin<KBox<Self>>
> let ca: CoherentAllocation<MyStruct> =
> CoherentAllocation::alloc_coherent(pdev.as_ref(), TEST_VALUES.len(), GFP_KERNEL)?;
>
> - || -> Result {
> - for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
> - kernel::dma_write!(ca[i] = MyStruct::new(value.0, value.1));
> - }
> -
> - Ok(())
> - }()?;
> + for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
> + kernel::dma_write!(ca[i] = MyStruct::new(value.0, value.1))?;
> + }
>
> let drvdata = KBox::new(
> Self {
> @@ -78,13 +74,10 @@ impl Drop for DmaSampleDriver {
> fn drop(&mut self) {
> dev_info!(self.pdev.as_ref(), "Unload DMA test driver.\n");
>
> - let _ = || -> Result {
> - for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
> - assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].h), value.0);
> - assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].b), value.1);
> - }
> - Ok(())
> - }();
> + for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
> + assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].h).unwrap(), value.0);
> + assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].b).unwrap(), value.1);
> + }
This changes the behavior from before: now an error will result in a
panic where before it was just ignored. Not sure what to do here since
it's a sample, but if you intend the functional change, I would mention
it in the commit message.
---
Cheers,
Benno
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 20:11 [PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator Abdiel Janulgue
2025-03-26 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] rust: dma: be consistent in using the `coherent` nomenclature Abdiel Janulgue
2025-03-27 22:20 ` Benno Lossin
2025-04-08 12:27 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-03-26 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result Abdiel Janulgue
2025-03-26 20:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-28 11:17 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2025-03-31 12:16 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-03-27 22:26 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-04-08 12:33 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-04-08 13:34 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-08 19:46 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-04-08 21:54 ` Benno Lossin
2025-04-08 21:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-08 12:29 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-03-26 20:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation Abdiel Janulgue
2025-03-27 22:31 ` Benno Lossin
2025-03-31 7:23 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-03-27 23:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-08 3:08 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-04-10 9:02 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-10 9:52 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-04-08 12:39 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-03-26 20:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-26 20:25 ` Abdiel Janulgue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D8REH728BFP1.2BGE9DTRP2IPU@proton.me \
--to=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox