From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB3E28E2
	for <iommu@lists.linux.dev>; Mon,  7 Nov 2022 10:54:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09D53C433D6;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2022 10:54:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:54:36 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/dma: Force bouncing of the size is not
 cacheline-aligned
Message-ID: <Y2jj7PlrIC6weDch@arm.com>
References: <20221106220143.2129263-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
 <20221106220143.2129263-4-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
 <20221107094603.GB6055@lst.de>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <iommu.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:iommu+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iommu+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221107094603.GB6055@lst.de>

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 10:46:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static inline bool dma_sg_kmalloc_needs_bounce(struct device *dev,
> > +					       struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> > +					       enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > +{
> > +	struct scatterlist *s;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC) ||
> > +	    dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
> > +		return false;
> 
> This part should be shared with dma-direct in a well documented helper.
> 
> > +	for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
> > +		if (dma_kmalloc_needs_bounce(dev, s->length, dir))
> > +			return true;
> > +	}
> 
> And for this loop iteration I'd much prefer it to be out of line, and
> also not available in a global helper.
> 
> But maybe someone can come up with a nice tweak to the dma-iommu
> code to not require the extra sglist walk anyway.

An idea: we could add another member to struct scatterlist to track the
bounced address. We can then do the bouncing in a similar way to
iommu_dma_map_sg_swiotlb() but without the iova allocation. The latter
would be a common path for both the bounced and non-bounced cases.

-- 
Catalin