From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B781E23B7
	for <iommu@lists.linux.dev>; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zn.tnic (p5de8e9fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.232.233.254])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 9AA9A1EC034B;
	Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:05:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
	t=1672315555;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
	bh=cyJkrUGJK+DwfWw8qU0s1ebSQzN3dnFxuLq2Sd4e5ew=;
	b=U0G0Oh9qxIRX0ofMOwZYFfr9s3742G+u7FePzxCECJfCDTjMTIeTsDexCQgTa/kpIgPSfV
	RnQ9i1UxSbufAV79d5pQ4wPk1dsxQwJrw6w8Rka5No9REG7IJ9XNJs4C3Fcz8IOsi1JtwG
	ia4RV5U51LAlUGPF4kt7eh8PqQtC2Cg=
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:05:55 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
	wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	hch@infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	isaku.yamahata@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	jane.chu@oracle.com, seanjc@google.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 03/13] Drivers: hv: Explicitly request decrypted in
 vmap_pfn() calls
Message-ID: <Y62CozIJ/aY2Tr7z@zn.tnic>
References: <1669951831-4180-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
 <1669951831-4180-4-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <iommu.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:iommu+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iommu+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1669951831-4180-4-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:21PM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:
> In preparation for a subsequent patch,

Yeah, once those are all in git, the concept of "subsequent patch"
becomes ambiguous depending on how you're sorting them. So try to read
that commit message out of the context of all those "subsequent patches"
and see if it still makes sense.

IOW, you should strive for your commit messages to make sense on their
own, without referencing other patches. If possible, that is.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette