Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	Daniel Marcovitch <dmarcovitch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state refcount dec hit 0 warning on pasid unbind
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:23:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8/32rScnCHTacQT@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124104355.119166-2-vasant.hegde@amd.com>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:43:53AM +0000, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> From: Daniel Marcovitch <dmarcovitch@nvidia.com>
> 
> When unbinding pasid - a race condition exists vs outstanding page faults.
> 
> To prevent this, the pasid_state object contains a refcount.
>     * set to 1 on pasid bind
>     * incremented on each ppr notification start
>     * decremented on each ppr notification done
>     * decremented on pasid unbind

I've no objection to this quick fix

But the issue here is using a refcount for something that is not a
refcount. This usage model is should just be a normal atomic if it is
only counting the number of notifications in progress.

To be a refcount to have to follow one of the standard refcount
patterns, ie get rid of the event queue and consistently do:

if (refcount_dec_and_test())
    free_pasid_state()

Which implies the ppr notification done can do a defered free of the
pasid_state.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-24 10:43 [PATCH 0/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix refcount related issues Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state refcount dec hit 0 warning on pasid unbind Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-27  4:44     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-01-27 12:58       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state->wq race Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:30   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Prevent scheduling new ppr notifier during unbind_pasid Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:33   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-27  4:58     ` Vasant Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8/32rScnCHTacQT@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dmarcovitch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox