Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:53:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmqqaXtqev9FUJo7@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421052121.3464100-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:21:12PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Attaching an IOMMU domain to a PASID of a device is a generic operation
> for modern IOMMU drivers which support PASID-granular DMA address
> translation. Currently visible usage scenarios include (but not limited):
> 
>  - SVA (Shared Virtual Address)
>  - kernel DMA with PASID
>  - hardware-assist mediated device
> 
> This adds a pair of common domain ops for this purpose and adds helpers
> to attach/detach a domain to/from a {device, PASID}. Some buses, like
> PCI, route packets without considering the PASID value. Thus a DMA target
> address with PASID might be treated as P2P if the address falls into the
> MMIO BAR of other devices in the group. To make things simple, these
> interfaces only apply to devices belonging to the singleton groups, and
> the singleton is immutable in fabric i.e. not affected by hotplug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
[...]
> +/*
> + * Use standard PCI bus topology, isolation features, and DMA
> + * alias quirks to check the immutable singleton attribute. If
> + * the device came from DT, assume it is static and then
> + * singleton can know from the device count in the group.
> + */
> +static bool device_group_immutable_singleton(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_group *group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> +	int count;
> +
> +	if (!group)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> +	count = iommu_group_device_count(group);
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
> +	iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> +	if (count != 1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> +		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The device could be considered to be fully isolated if
> +		 * all devices on the path from the device to the host-PCI
> +		 * bridge are protected from peer-to-peer DMA by ACS.
> +		 */
> +		if (!pci_acs_path_enabled(pdev, NULL, REQ_ACS_FLAGS))
> +			return false;
> +
> +		/* Filter out devices which has any alias device. */
> +		if (pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, has_pci_alias, pdev))
> +			return false;

Aren't aliases already added to the group by pci_device_group()?  If so
it's part of the count check above

> +
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the device came from DT, assume it is static and then
> +	 * singleton can know from the device count in the group.
> +	 */
> +	return is_of_node(dev_fwnode(dev));

I don't think DT is relevant here because a platform device enumerated
through ACPI will also have its own group. It should be safe to stick to
what the IOMMU drivers declare with their device_group() callback. Except
for PCI those groups should be immutable so we can return true here.

Thanks,
Jean

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21  5:21 [PATCH v4 00/12] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] dmaengine: idxd: Separate user and kernel pasid enabling Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops Lu Baolu
2022-04-28 14:53   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2022-04-29  6:27     ` Baolu Lu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] iommu/sva: Basic data structures for SVA Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE support Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] arm-smmu-v3/sva: " Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] iommu/sva: Use attach/detach_pasid_dev in SVA interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF Lu Baolu
2022-04-28 14:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-04-29  6:17     ` Baolu Lu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] iommu: Per-domain I/O page fault handling Lu Baolu
2022-04-28 14:57   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-04-29  6:35     ` Baolu Lu
2022-04-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmqqaXtqev9FUJo7@myrica \
    --to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox