From: Nicolin Chen via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Try info->iommu in device_to_iommu()
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:48:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn6L6FFf6icax1Cv@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513115032.GM1343366@nvidia.com>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 08:50:32AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Perhaps, we can make device_to_iommu() only for probe_device() where the
> > per-device info data is not initialized yet. After probe_device(), iommu
> > and sid are retrieved through other helpers by looking up the device
> > info directly?
>
> This design makes the most sense to me... Nicolin you said there was a
> case where attach was happening before probe though??
I was testing on top of our IOMMUFD dev branch actually, which
is still on 5.17 where priv/info seems to be set at the end of
first ->attach_dev() call. In 5.18, Baolu has already cleaned
away some code. So now, just eyeballing here, it should be set
at driver's ->probe_device() call, so it'd be safe to get info
in attach_dev (and in the new op that we are adding).
I am also rebasing our dev branch to more recent version btw.
Thanks
Nic
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 0:32 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Try info->iommu in device_to_iommu() Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-05-13 3:32 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-13 3:59 ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-05-13 11:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-13 16:48 ` Nicolin Chen via iommu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn6L6FFf6icax1Cv@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox