From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Cc: Yang Shen <shenyang39@huawei.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uacce: fix concurrency of fops_open and uacce_remove
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:16:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yqn3spLZHpAkQ9Us@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610123423.27496-1-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 08:34:23PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> The uacce parent's module can be removed when uacce is working,
> which may cause troubles.
>
> If rmmod/uacce_remove happens just after fops_open: bind_queue,
> the uacce_remove can not remove the bound queue since it is not
> added to the queue list yet, which blocks the uacce_disable_sva.
>
> Change queues_lock area to make sure the bound queue is added to
> the list thereby can be searched in uacce_remove.
>
> And uacce->parent->driver is checked immediately in case rmmod is
> just happening.
>
> Also the parent driver must always stop DMA before calling
> uacce_remove.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shen <shenyang39@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> index 281c54003edc..b6219c6bfb48 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> @@ -136,9 +136,16 @@ static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> if (!q)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + mutex_lock(&uacce->queues_lock);
> +
> + if (!uacce->parent->driver) {
I don't think this is useful, because the core clears parent->driver after
having run uacce_remove():
rmmod hisi_zip open()
... uacce_fops_open()
__device_release_driver() ...
pci_device_remove()
hisi_zip_remove()
hisi_qm_uninit()
uacce_remove()
... ...
mutex_lock(uacce->queues_lock)
... if (!uacce->parent->driver)
device_unbind_cleanup() /* driver still valid, proceed */
dev->driver = NULL
Since uacce_remove() disabled SVA, the following uacce_bind_queue() will
fail anyway. However, if uacce->flags does not have UACCE_DEV_SVA set,
we'll proceed further and call uacce->ops->get_queue(), which does not
exist anymore since the parent module is gone.
I think we need the global uacce_mutex to serialize uacce_remove() and
uacce_fops_open(). uacce_remove() would do everything, including
xa_erase(), while holding that mutex. And uacce_fops_open() would try to
obtain the uacce object from the xarray while holding the mutex, which
fails if the uacce object is being removed.
Thanks,
Jean
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_with_lock;
> + }
> +
> ret = uacce_bind_queue(uacce, q);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_with_mem;
> + goto out_with_lock;
>
> q->uacce = uacce;
>
> @@ -153,7 +160,6 @@ static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> uacce->inode = inode;
> q->state = UACCE_Q_INIT;
>
> - mutex_lock(&uacce->queues_lock);
> list_add(&q->list, &uacce->queues);
> mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>
> @@ -161,7 +167,8 @@ static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>
> out_with_bond:
> uacce_unbind_queue(q);
> -out_with_mem:
> +out_with_lock:
> + mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
> kfree(q);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -171,10 +178,10 @@ static int uacce_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> struct uacce_queue *q = filep->private_data;
>
> mutex_lock(&q->uacce->queues_lock);
> - list_del(&q->list);
> - mutex_unlock(&q->uacce->queues_lock);
> uacce_put_queue(q);
> uacce_unbind_queue(q);
> + list_del(&q->list);
> + mutex_unlock(&q->uacce->queues_lock);
> kfree(q);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -513,10 +520,10 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
> uacce_put_queue(q);
> uacce_unbind_queue(q);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>
> /* disable sva now since no opened queues */
> uacce_disable_sva(uacce);
> + mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>
> if (uacce->cdev)
> cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
> --
> 2.36.1
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 12:34 [PATCH] uacce: fix concurrency of fops_open and uacce_remove Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-15 15:16 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2022-06-16 4:10 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-16 8:14 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-06-17 6:05 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-17 8:20 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-17 14:23 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-20 13:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-06-20 13:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-06-20 13:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-21 7:37 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-21 7:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-22 8:14 ` Zhangfei Gao
2022-06-22 8:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-20 13:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-20 20:18 ` [PATCH] uacce: Tidy up locking kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yqn3spLZHpAkQ9Us@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shenyang39@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox