Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok_raj@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Question about reserved_regions w/ Intel IOMMU
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:38:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIH1/e2OcCuD7DEi@araj-dh-work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UcE5bUe7ChytSyUWEkyqdwnNR1k_rcfyykPPWJ=ZzsdRg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:33:31AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:05 PM Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/8/23 7:03 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:40 PM Alexander Duyck
> > > <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am running into a DMA issue that appears to be a conflict between
> > >> ACS and IOMMU. As per the documentation I can find, the IOMMU is
> > >> supposed to create reserved regions for MSI and the memory window
> > >> behind the root port. However looking at reserved_regions I am not
> > >> seeing that. I only see the reservation for the MSI.
> > >>
> > >> So for example with an enabled NIC and iommu enabled w/o passthru I am seeing:
> > >> # cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:83\:00.0/iommu_group/reserved_regions
> > >> 0x00000000fee00000 0x00000000feefffff msi
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't there also be a memory window for the region behind the root
> > >> port to prevent any possible peer-to-peer access?
> > >
> > > Since the iommu portion of the email bounced I figured I would fix
> > > that and provide some additional info.
> > >
> > > I added some instrumentation to the kernel to dump the resources found
> > > in iova_reserve_pci_windows. From what I can tell it is finding the
> > > correct resources for the Memory and Prefetchable regions behind the
> > > root port. It seems to be calling reserve_iova which is successfully
> > > allocating an iova to reserve the region.
> > >
> > > However still no luck on why it isn't showing up in reserved_regions.
> >
> > Perhaps I can ask the opposite question, why it should show up in
> > reserve_regions? Why does the iommu subsystem block any possible peer-
> > to-peer DMA access? Isn't that a decision of the device driver.
> >
> > The iova_reserve_pci_windows() you've seen is for kernel DMA interfaces
> > which is not related to peer-to-peer accesses.
> 
> The problem is if the IOVA overlaps with the physical addresses of
> other devices that can be routed to via ACS redirect. As such if ACS
> redirect is enabled a host IOVA could be directed to another device on
> the switch instead. To prevent that we need to reserve those addresses
> to avoid address space collisions.

Any untranslated address from a device must be forwarded to the IOMMU when
ACS is enabled correct? I guess if you want true p2p, then you would need
to map so that the hpa turns into the peer address.. but its always a round
trip to IOMMU. 

> 
> From what I can tell it looks like the IOVA should be reserved, but I
> don't see it showing up anywhere in reserved_regions. What I am
> wondering is if iova_reserve_pci_windows() should be taking some steps
> so that it will appear, or if  intel_iommu_get_resv_regions() needs to
> have some code similar to iova_reserve_pci_windows() to get the ranges
> and verify they are reserved in the IOVA.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAKgT0UezciLjHacOx372+v8MZkDf22D5Thn82n-07xxKy_0FTQ@mail.gmail.com>
2023-06-07 23:03 ` Question about reserved_regions w/ Intel IOMMU Alexander Duyck
2023-06-08  3:03   ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-08 14:33     ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-08 15:38       ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2023-06-08 17:10         ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-08 17:52           ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-08 18:15             ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-08 18:02           ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-08 18:17             ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-08 15:28     ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-13 15:54       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-16  8:39         ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-16 12:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-16 15:27             ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-16 16:34               ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-16 18:59                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-19 10:20                   ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-19 14:02                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-20 14:57                       ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-20 16:55                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-20 17:47                           ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-21 11:30                             ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-16 18:48               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-21  8:16             ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIH1/e2OcCuD7DEi@araj-dh-work \
    --to=ashok_raj@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox