From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [85.214.250.239]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87A7A4C for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 8bytes.org (p200300f6af03f600fd690381fa83412b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:f6:af03:f600:fd69:381:fa83:412b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2132A280007; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:12:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1689405163; bh=yKnctbjoOdhkZFqSVPSHGkZbIRIXDLEr61uG+EIWhtg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B/iB+5BFJq5yGplXuiSmROaEENfl80bM0BIybABCFPw5y3ECfVerKFwfUZEJg8oJt cwxXusZxmI0zf+L/w0ZN0UgrU9zBo3sWwhJbMH7FlOiE3wMTinKelfBBxE/AWMNT3t cIElhV8RSdhNTqEMW3XZ2cIByA6yrSV6Cxm7iT8m/1riEb719SzZ5ldwCqHx682gSg wsXwmKenHLUuH0YpO08JQ6b5qNfb53OTmfafHCUxBbRnhPop2BvYctT9iG8KayAAQu nQnjzXvR7bMsKG5VgkP3m/CnkQr7MdVlRdVcJq9ufiIc9VU9cgJcI3mUGGHfX+Vhml meGY+7KBENvew== Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:12:41 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [git pull] IOMMU Fixes for Linux v6.5-rc1 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:19:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Nope. Nothing there. > > Guys, 'git request-pull' should be *warning* you if what you claim is > there isn't actually there. Ugh, sorry about that. I only pushed the changes to my backup-tree at Github, but not to kernel.org. That is fixed now and I will send another request soon. The pull-request emails are generated by a script on my side (with the option for me the edit the message before sending), but I checked again with manually executing 'git request-pull'. It looked to me like the only difference between pushed and not-pushed remote-tags is the tags/ prefix in the proposed pull-head, and I obviously missed that. Sorry again. Regards, Joerg