From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB7EC4CECE for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7C021925 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="jKQfI+tv"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="jKQfI+tv" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BC7C021925 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B380FD0; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB39F51 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (smtp.codeaurora.org [198.145.29.96]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A3381A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D30946141C; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1568863109; bh=QsV/8fQdOXJe1K2A9PF7ZFpmLj/7hgXHE/kdC5ZdvrM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jKQfI+tvCa6szr1MwLs9kgRzRydN4ZMHgSp0irIcw2NAA1qCNGRVw79A7UKZmLD/U MTL72gi0jyfWJVlRVSr2SxGn8xweI7870oC8l5dAKQ0P28QBW3NTk5n5NAtTDtx/o0 B22o7hnRcqKlwWE+A0YcdTcaaL77gHmZdGenEvKA= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A3360767; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 03:18:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1568863109; bh=QsV/8fQdOXJe1K2A9PF7ZFpmLj/7hgXHE/kdC5ZdvrM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jKQfI+tvCa6szr1MwLs9kgRzRydN4ZMHgSp0irIcw2NAA1qCNGRVw79A7UKZmLD/U MTL72gi0jyfWJVlRVSr2SxGn8xweI7870oC8l5dAKQ0P28QBW3NTk5n5NAtTDtx/o0 B22o7hnRcqKlwWE+A0YcdTcaaL77gHmZdGenEvKA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:48:28 +0530 From: Sai Prakash Ranjan To: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook In-Reply-To: <20190919002501.GA20859@builder> References: <1513424ecec891d19c1aa3c599ec67db7964b6b2.1568712606.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> <20190919002501.GA20859@builder> Message-ID: X-Sender: saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Cc: Rajendra Nayak , Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On 2019-09-19 05:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > In the transition to this new design we lost the ability to > enable/disable the safe toggle per board, which according to Vivek > would result in some issue with Cheza. > > Can you confirm that this is okay? (Or introduce the DT property for > enabling the safe_toggle logic?) > Hmm, I don't remember Vivek telling about any issue on Cheza because of this logic. But I will test this on Cheza and let you know. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu