From: "Horia Geantă" <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@nxp.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: CAAM: kernel BUG at drivers/crypto/caam/jr.c:230! (and dma-coherent query)
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:26:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a52e0a0f-a784-2430-4b37-fb9fdcf3692b@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301152231.GC5549@pengutronix.de>
Adding some people in the loop, maybe they could help in understanding
why lack of "dma-coherent" property for a HW-coherent device could lead to
unexpected / strange side effects.
On 3/1/2021 5:22 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am on a Layerscape LS1046a using Linux-5.11. The CAAM driver sometimes
> crashes during the run-time self tests with:
>
>> kernel BUG at drivers/crypto/caam/jr.c:247!
>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.11.0-20210225-3-00039-g434215968816-dirty #12
>> Hardware name: TQ TQMLS1046A SoM on Arkona AT1130 (C300) board (DT)
>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
>> pc : caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c
>> lr : caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c
>> sp : ffff800010003d50
>> x29: ffff800010003d50 x28: ffff8000118d4000
>> x27: ffff8000118d4328 x26: 00000000000001f0
>> x25: ffff0008022be480 x24: ffff0008022c6410
>> x23: 00000000000001f1 x22: ffff8000118d4329
>> x21: 0000000000004d80 x20: 00000000000001f1
>> x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000020
>> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000015
>> x15: ffff800011690230 x14: 2e2e2e2e2e2e2e2e
>> x13: 2e2e2e2e2e2e2020 x12: 3030303030303030
>> x11: ffff800011700a38 x10: 00000000fffff000
>> x9 : ffff8000100ada30 x8 : ffff8000116a8a38
>> x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000000
>> x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
>> x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000000
>> x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000001800
>> Call trace:
>> caam_jr_dequeue+0x98/0x57c
>> tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x164/0x18c
>> tasklet_action+0x44/0x54
>> __do_softirq+0x160/0x454
>> __irq_exit_rcu+0x164/0x16c
>> irq_exit+0x1c/0x30
>> __handle_domain_irq+0xc0/0x13c
>> gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xf0
>> el1_irq+0xb4/0x180
>> arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x30
>> default_idle_call+0x3c/0x1c0
>> do_idle+0x23c/0x274
>> cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x70
>> rest_init+0xdc/0xec
>> arch_call_rest_init+0x1c/0x28
>> start_kernel+0x4ac/0x4e4
>> Code: 91392021 912c2000 d377d8c6 97f24d96 (d4210000)
>
> The driver iterates over the descriptors in the output ring and matches them
> with the ones it has previously queued. If it doesn't find a matching
> descriptor it complains with the BUG_ON() seen above. What I see sometimes is
> that the address in the output ring is 0x0, the job status in this case is
> 0x40000006 (meaning DECO Invalid KEY command). It seems that the CAAM doesn't
> write the descriptor address to the output ring at least in some error cases.
> When we don't have the descriptor address of the failed descriptor we have no
> way to find it in the list of queued descriptors, thus we also can't find the
> callback for that descriptor. This looks very unfortunate, anyone else seen
> this or has an idea what to do about it?
>
> I haven't investigated yet which job actually fails and why. Of course that would
> be my ultimate goal to find that out.
>
This looks very similar to an earlier report from Greg.
He confirmed that adding "dma-coherent" property to the "crypto" DT node
fixes the issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/74f664f5-5433-d322-4789-3c78bdb814d8@kernel.org
Patch rebased on v5.11 is at the bottom. Does it work for you too?
What I don't understand (and the reason I've postponed upstreaming it) is
_why_ exactly this patch is working.
I would have expected that a HW-coherent device to work fine even without
the "dma-coherent" DT property in the corresponding node.
I've found what seems related discussions involving eSDHC, but still I am trying
to figure out what's happening. I'd really appreciate a clarification on what
could go wrong (e.g. interactions with SW-based cache management etc.):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20190916171509.GG25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191010083503.250941866@linuxfoundation.org
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/AM7PR04MB688507B5B4D84EB266738891F8320@AM7PR04MB6885.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com
Thanks,
Horia
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1046a: mark crypto engine dma coherent
Crypto engine (CAAM) on LS1046A platform has support for HW coherency,
mark accordingly the DT node.
Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi
index 025e1f587662..6d4db3e021e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@
ranges = <0x0 0x00 0x1700000 0x100000>;
reg = <0x00 0x1700000 0x0 0x100000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ dma-coherent;
sec_jr0: jr@10000 {
compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.4-job-ring",
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210301152231.GC5549@pengutronix.de>
2021-03-03 10:26 ` Horia Geantă [this message]
2021-03-03 12:07 ` CAAM: kernel BUG at drivers/crypto/caam/jr.c:230! (and dma-coherent query) Robin Murphy
2021-03-03 16:04 ` Horia Geantă
2021-03-03 14:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-03-03 16:40 ` Horia Geantă
2021-03-04 17:02 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a52e0a0f-a784-2430-4b37-fb9fdcf3692b@nxp.com \
--to=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=aymen.sghaier@nxp.com \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox