From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Jason Sequeira <jsequeira@nvidia.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dma/pool: Use vmap() address for memory encryption helpers on ARM64
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:26:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJonrTrr6nW7qdLI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811005036.714274-2-sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 07:50:34PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> In atomic_pool_expand(), set_memory_encrypted()/set_memory_decrypted()
> are currently called with page_to_virt(page). On ARM64 with
> CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP=y, the atomic pool is mapped via vmap(), so
> page_to_virt(page) does not reference the actual mapped region.
>
> Using this incorrect address can cause encryption attribute updates to
> be applied to the wrong memory region. On ARM64 systems with memory
> encryption enabled (e.g. CCA), this can lead to data corruption or
> crashes.
>
> Fix this by using the vmap() address ('addr') on ARM64 when invoking
> the memory encryption helpers, while retaining the existing
> page_to_virt(page) usage for other architectures.
>
> Fixes: 76a19940bd62 ("dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from atomic coherent pools")
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
> ---
> kernel/dma/pool.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> index 7b04f7575796b..ba08a301590fd 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static int atomic_pool_expand(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t pool_size,
> {
> unsigned int order;
> struct page *page = NULL;
> + void *vaddr;
> void *addr;
> int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -113,8 +114,8 @@ static int atomic_pool_expand(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t pool_size,
> * Memory in the atomic DMA pools must be unencrypted, the pools do not
> * shrink so no re-encryption occurs in dma_direct_free().
> */
> - ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page),
> - 1 << order);
> + vaddr = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) ? addr : page_to_virt(page);
> + ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, 1 << order);
At least with arm CCA, there are two aspects to setting the memory
encrypted/decrypted: an RMM (realm management monitor) call and setting
of the attributes of the stage 1 mapping. The RMM call doesn't care
about the virtual address, only the (intermediate) physical address, so
having page_to_virt(page) here is fine.
The second part is setting the (fake) attribute for this mapping (top
bit of the IPA space). Can we not instead just call:
addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, pool_size,
pgprot_decrypted(pgprot_dmacoherent(PAGE_KERNEL)),
__builtin_return_address(0));
in the atomic pool code? The advantage is that we keep the
set_memory_decrypted() call on the linear map so that we change its
attributes as well.
I want avoid walking the page tables for vmap regions if possible in the
arm64 set_memory_* implementation. At some point I was proposing a
GFP_DECRYPTED flag for allocations but never got around to post a patch
(and implement vmalloc() support):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZmNJdSxSz-sYpVgI@arm.com/
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 0:50 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Add encrypt/decrypt support for vmalloc regions Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 0:50 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dma/pool: Use vmap() address for memory encryption helpers on ARM64 Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-11 12:09 ` Robin Murphy
2025-08-11 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-08-11 18:31 ` Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 0:50 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] arm64: Add encrypt/decrypt support for vmalloc regions Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 8:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-11 13:23 ` Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 12:31 ` Robin Murphy
2025-08-11 13:05 ` Shanker Donthineni
2025-08-11 14:17 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJonrTrr6nW7qdLI@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jsequeira@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox