Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Quarantine device upon ATC invalidation timeout

Nicolin Chen
2026-03-24T01:30:38Z

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 08:10:01PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 02:29:38AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > > This series addresses a critical vulnerability and stability issue where an
> > > > > > unresponsive PCIe device failing to process ATC (Address Translation
> > > > Cache)
> > > > > > invalidation requests leads to silent data corruption and continuous
> > > > SMMU
> > > > > > CMDQ error spam.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > None of the patches in this series contains a Fixed tag and cc stable.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, I guess AI overly polished the cover letter so it sounds too
> > > > strong?
> > > >
> > > > This is essentially a vulnerability (potential memory corruption).
> > > > And none of these patches actually fixes any regression. The PATCH
> > > > 7 even requires the arm_smmu_invs series which has not been merged
> > > > yet :-/
> > > >
> > >
> > > Fixes tag and backporting are not just for regression. People certainly
> > > want to see reported vulnerabilities fixed in stable kernels...
> >
> > Well, maybe I'll just leave additional line telling people that this
> > can't be a bug "fix" because it's written on another unmerged series?
>
> I think this is more of a feature (RAS support for SMMUv3) than a
> specific fix.

Adding that to the cover-letter. Thanks for the input.

Nicolin