Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, jgg@nvidia.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 rc] iommu: Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID capability
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 14:23:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae0c9a42-5898-4bc6-b104-aab90ddbc751@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520011937.3230557-1-tdave@nvidia.com>

On 5/20/2025 6:49 AM, Tushar Dave wrote:
> Generally PASID support requires ACS settings that usually create
> single device groups, but there are some niche cases where we can get
> multi-device groups and still have working PASID support. The primary
> issue is that PCI switches are not required to treat PASID tagged TLPs
> specially so appropriate ACS settings are required to route all TLPs to
> the host bridge if PASID is going to work properly.
> 
> pci_enable_pasid() does check that each device that will use PASID has
> the proper ACS settings to achieve this routing.
> 
> However, no-PASID devices can be combined with PASID capable devices
> within the same topology using non-uniform ACS settings. In this case
> the no-PASID devices may not have strict route to host ACS flags and
> end up being grouped with the PASID devices.
> 
> This configuration fails to allow use of the PASID within the iommu
> core code which wrongly checks if the no-PASID device supports PASID.
> 
> Fix this by ignoring no-PASID devices during the PASID validation. They
> will never issue a PASID TLP anyhow so they can be ignored.
> 
> Fixes: c404f55c26fc ("iommu: Validate the PASID in iommu_attach_device_pasid()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>

-Vasant





  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20  1:19 [PATCH v4 rc] iommu: Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID capability Tushar Dave
2025-05-20  8:53 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2025-05-20  9:12 ` Baolu Lu
2025-05-22  7:10 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae0c9a42-5898-4bc6-b104-aab90ddbc751@amd.com \
    --to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox