From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663EB4DC54E for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 14:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779201618; cv=none; b=onTIjIg8m5+1kWWP7/UHugiLrXi9CyqzZhfYH3gFOXKuiYhn6tzLmFQH7NaRFqD0TzythzSfYxnNnYb6pLsGR/kZInnRnAvsQD6iwFrKUpZe3t1TEFa87npikdISccRIiWQSgKAfXKGfHOm2Ep7c/N6NYrjCFUs+JnVqcWJ2ht8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779201618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f4R4U5Ar4zJ/4MQD6l6HxvWkEJAg60iD6DPVV1Prcak=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tExUQKlDcsLkhGwFuYJcH7KhibqGomZ67wbIkpyISZzjK4Q1CBvWGdwAC4tG63Lcne30cRysgRBb8dZruyuwq6OUmYpYK5WYLf6dtxSU5lGhQcpO4XIfXzjJ9Xr/8JgAc1HcIxemYqjVpu/TItGAmhr5YaRaddsb9BYJDPWAyeE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=WVpmDz+3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="WVpmDz+3" Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b2e8b95bdbso1405ad.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 07:40:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1779201616; x=1779806416; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pFrnW7yNBIXff+8j+5lqhWdfBhK7nbCJmLOYnxsRaNg=; b=WVpmDz+3GbJqsTex3AsD37mgAhukLxkxm/q2+YvIZbYA0F9OX3C+TN4zNOsr3t6Isd jqbwvm5Q0YfB7bJeEr2Wv7g9aY436b+ouSfC24+m5WqSnxyeP1Dz/4gMUIok/SaG5nJy j2yhZjutvAGO9BpIJH0D3WX5iKlTF+wLReAR7ASQLKt8wR6W1xbJyyzBsOrupv99npC9 bSLRiD2hq1zZPu1Iuk14tESdDC4WaRPs3PQuw+6TEq8htnqXlFUXjCtbnsf5HBKUJReg 2G1PI9NnCw/CptSty+LoeA1qKD54ld7QGvXWBcQwAtv0UNzSW4W0peOD3n/S/pwXuLGU tXhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779201616; x=1779806416; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pFrnW7yNBIXff+8j+5lqhWdfBhK7nbCJmLOYnxsRaNg=; b=ldtVrTInK/ZHCErBQsnz+iabCYyU5uAx9fb5+3THfniAoLHu2GErEb2qJV3b78n5ZU BuEGdz0Anu2QOJdKt0QHTpZuXCyfZJFagNCsvfgxorN7uWgSnecsGTrga7jgZmAXAN/H r4uMkyY79oR7rnNHL0CNfQCJJxILnlJHqLgJYnaoBNZZPB1JcIdT682qT3z5OwiNKOuL 8Z0UZKlXjYOG9+H3JoUHjTObKSX+W+0LAlvPdAnNJPZmRQ6R7h2poRz2HtnEt7Jp2mSs 104r3/XJqQHuSIWnx5AQEz4FkCB9+YmWlepCBw+cukUXT/Ad8RMOMktznAyb0XstsIHr Jhdw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9DHOCa/9SF11tFTyyQWdh8uSyoe5d2if3W5sHMoIdWL6GfBaiiOw7aSeSu50dmDaiMuffC2A==@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzUguExlStTUqv0xBuGKRlfV2v2dzP/ExdTEG+A33tLdvWLvitG COFuUt4CfECTZ+tvxXxKC04TcpPz3fBZ5hFmr0qwsXl2jQG0mAm/9x5PUcxlOmbzKw== X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGIFHGSPFr7g4AdsqTZuNasUQlvPcUaGDwrF3gocPNGDo3lDRRKLlpkRCAnme6 WQRTBFw5nLllOS7zgfKNBxli3gFARSa6dRZ7eUQSfiucxPwyF30ot+WxWkhwLIPLUxqMSEj4w8S FSol0oFtR5VCgS5s2CndoqSx06J0YJbii9IwzOWBLF0zGU3s6YCesbUQMdZxZiq+um3w0F1Keo1 fShxh5O/VhqVPQeUof09tyv45hdDQEbCjNVgJVilsTPRIw/6lKLRChq5I5R2RMIKPc2zIWO9JpN 9417eQ8IKuJMicZtJKm/Z4QVhf4sqRV254FPNgGz21mEgWeuj4s5aOot6S9l7JZLwbbNFcSJ9h7 Y+WWcQc6CkW07TPeuPtHxPybrEL/SxOQGVuwszzxWVRAW6IW9eVCObxwgbwyGvPdaJUBD1LGLEA HjdTmjXEus0LpJUl9G79m0hpsOeDF90A0Ja9E8DqgOYb5w53CjNK/GfCC62OX8aJtL7O2X X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:46ce:b0:2bd:9e75:9e98 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2bdb329b484mr6449415ad.9.1779201614999; Tue, 19 May 2026 07:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (44.234.124.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.124.234.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2bd5bd5ef27sm242035275ad.8.2026.05.19.07.40.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 May 2026 07:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 14:40:05 +0000 From: Pranjal Shrivastava To: Samiullah Khawaja Cc: Baolu Lu , David Woodhouse , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Jason Gunthorpe , Robin Murphy , Kevin Tian , Alex Williamson , Shuah Khan , iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Adithya Jayachandran , Parav Pandit , Leon Romanovsky , William Tu , Pratyush Yadav , Pasha Tatashin , David Matlack , Andrew Morton , Chris Li , Vipin Sharma , YiFei Zhu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Message-ID: References: <20260427175633.1978233-1-skhawaja@google.com> <20260427175633.1978233-8-skhawaja@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 08:32:42PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 02:36:56AM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote: > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 02:25:14PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote: > > > On 4/28/26 01:56, Samiullah Khawaja wrote: > > > > Add implementation of the device and iommu presevation in a separate > > > > file. Also set the device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops in the > > > > struct iommu_ops. > > > > > > > > During normal shutdown the iommu translation is disabled. Since the root > > > > table is preserved during live update, it needs to be cleaned up and the > > > > context entries of the unpreserved devices need to be cleared. > > > > > > This is not related to preserve/unpreserve ops and could be made in a > > > separated patch? > > > > Agreed. I will move this stuff to a separate patch. > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > > drivers/iommu/intel/Makefile | 1 + > > > > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 52 +++++++++++- > > > > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 28 +++++++ > > > > drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 18 ++++ > > > > include/linux/iommu-liveupdate.h | 10 +++ > > > > include/linux/iommu.h | 14 ++++ > > > > include/linux/kho/abi/iommu.h | 18 ++++ > > > > 9 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > +{ > > > > + struct context_entry *context; > > > > + int ret; > > > > + int i; > > > > + > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ROOT_ENTRY_NR; i++) { > > > > + /* > > > > + * Alloc the context tables now to make sure the iommu unit is > > > > + * properly preserved. These might stay unused and wastes around > > > > + * 32MB max in scalable mode. > > > > + */ > > > > > > Instead of allocating and preserving context tables for all root entries > > > (as noted, can waste up to 32MB), could we restrict this only to the > > > entries possibly in use by active PCI devices? > > > > I think the hotplug devices or VFs created through SR-IOV will be missed > > that way. Lets say device A is preserved and the associated iommu is > > also preserved. And then a new device B is hotplugged and preserved, > > then the context table for that will be missed. > > Ok I thought about it a little more and basically we have following > things to consider when we preserve context tables, > > - The devices can be hotplugged and preserved, so the context tables of > those need to be preserved if we don't allocate all of them first time > we preserve iommu, as done here. > - New context tables can be added (after hotplug) for unpreserved > devices. And if we don't get another iommu preserve call after these > are added, those remain unpreserved, so during shutdown those entries > need to be removed from root table or preserved for simplicity. > > To solve this we can, > > 1. Either preserve the new context table when it is added for a preserved > iommu. This can be done in iommu_context_addr(). This is simpler and > no tracking needed. > > 2. Or track the preserved context tables using a bitmap and then preserve > them incremently whenever a device is preserved. On shutdown during > cleanup, we can clear the entries for unpreserved context tables from > root table. > > I am inclined towards second option. WDYT? Thinking out loud here, I agree that shifting away from the 32MB pre-allocation is the right direction. I'm wondering if we can avoid the overhead of introducing a new tracking bitmap (Option 2) altogether? Since the IOMMU serialization is a strict dependency for device tracking, could we move the context table preservation directly into the device level op: intel_iommu_preserve_device()? Whenever a specific device is preserved on-demand: 1. It queries the parent IOMMU to fetch the allocated context table backing its info->bus. 2. It calls iommu_preserve_page(context) for that table. Because KHO's tracking handles duplicates, this should be fine if multiple devices reside on the same bus... Regarding Scalable Mode, we could just need a simple check in that path: /* intel_iommu_preserve_device */ /* Preserve the primary/lower context table backing this bus */ context = iommu_context_addr(info->iommu, info->bus, 0, 0); if (context) iommu_preserve_page(context); /* If scalable mode is active, preserve the upper context table as well */ if (sm_supported(info->iommu)) { context = iommu_context_addr(info->iommu, info->bus, 0x80, 0); if (context) iommu_preserve_page(context); } WDYT? > > I think we will have to do similar stuff for PASID also down the road to > preserve pasid_tables in PASID directory. > > > > Since we don't track the context_tables that are preserved, there is no > > way to incremently preserve the new-ones. Let me look into the behaviour > > of KHO, maybe we can make the preserve call idempotent and do these > > incrementally. > > > > > > > + spin_lock(&iommu->lock); > > > > + context = iommu_context_addr(iommu, i, 0, 1); > > > > + spin_unlock(&iommu->lock); > > > > + if (!context) { > > > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > > > + goto error; > > > > + } > [snip] Thanks, Praan