From: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"moderated list:MEDIATEK IOMMU DRIVER"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/mediatek: Always tlb_flush_all when each PM resume
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:18:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b246cd23-f19e-e3d9-a19e-2f598b6d1425@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35d53ea0-68db-a516-9e9c-272e8f0ed082@collabora.com>
On 08.12.21 11:50, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>
>
> On 07.12.21 10:31, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 27.11.21 04:46, Yong Wu wrote:
>>> Hi Dafna,
>>>
>>> Sorry for reply late.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 12:43 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>>>> From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>>>
>>>> Prepare for 2 HWs that sharing pgtable in different power-domains.
>>>>
>>>> When there are 2 M4U HWs, it may has problem in the flush_range in
>>>> which
>>>> we get the pm_status via the m4u dev, BUT that function don't reflect
>>>> the
>>>> real power-domain status of the HW since there may be other HW also
>>>> use
>>>> that power-domain.
>>>>
>>>> The function dma_alloc_attrs help allocate the iommu buffer which
>>>> need the corresponding power domain since tlb flush is needed when
>>>> preparing iova. BUT this function only is for allocating buffer,
>>>> we have no good reason to request the user always call pm_runtime_get
>>>> before calling dma_alloc_xxx. Therefore, we add a tlb_flush_all
>>>> in the pm_runtime_resume to make sure the tlb always is clean.
>>>>
>>>> Another solution is always call pm_runtime_get in the
>>>> tlb_flush_range.
>>>> This will trigger pm runtime resume/backup so often when the iommu
>>>> power is not active at some time(means user don't call pm_runtime_get
>>>> before calling dma_alloc_xxx), This may cause the performance drop.
>>>> thus we don't use this.
>>>>
>>>> In other case, the iommu's power should always be active via device
>>>> link with smi.
>>>>
>>>> The previous SoC don't have PM except mt8192. the mt8192 IOMMU is
>>>> display's
>>>> power-domain which nearly always is enabled. thus no need fix tags
>>>> here.
>>>> Prepare for mt8195.
>>>
>>> In this patchset, this message should be not proper. I think you could
>>> add the comment why this patch is needed in mt8173.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>>> [imporvie inline doc]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 7 +++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>>> index 25b834104790..28dc4b95b6d9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>>> @@ -964,6 +964,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused
>>>> mtk_iommu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Users may allocate dma buffer before they call
>>>> pm_runtime_get,
>>>> + * in which case it will lack the necessary tlb flush.
>>>> + * Thus, make sure to update the tlb after each PM resume.
>>>> + */
>>>> + mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(data);
>>>
>>> This should not work. since current the *_tlb_flush_all call
>>> pm_runtime_get_if_in_use which will always return 0 when it called from
>>> this runtime_cb in my test. thus, It won't do the tlb_flush_all
>>> actually.
>
> He, indeed, my mistake, although the encoder works more or less fine even
> without the full flush so I didn't catch that.
>
>>>
>>> I guess this also depend on these two patches of mt8195 v3.
>>> [PATCH v3 09/33] iommu/mediatek: Remove for_each_m4u in tlb_sync_all
>>> [PATCH v3 10/33] iommu/mediatek: Add tlb_lock in tlb_flush_all
>
> I'll add those two
>
>>>
>>> like in [10/33], I added a mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all which don't have
>>> the pm operation.
>
> yes, I need to remove the pm_runtime_get_if_in_use call in the 'flush_all' func
> I see there is also a patch for that in the mt8195 v3 series "[PATCH v3 13/33] iommu/mediatek: Remove the power status checking in tlb flush all"
>
> So I'll send v2, adding all those 3 patches, but I think adding mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all
> on patch 9 and removing it again on patch 13 is confusing so I'll avoid that.
>
In addition, the call to mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all from mtk_iommu_runtime_resume should move to the bottom of the function
after all values are updated
> Thanks,
> Dafna
>
>
>
>>>
>>> This looks has a dependence. Let me know if I can help this.
>>
>> It did work for me, testing on elm device. I'll check that again.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * Uppon first resume, only enable the clk and return, since
>>>> the values of the
>>>> * registers are not yet set.
>>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 10:43 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/mediatek: fix tlb flush logic Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-11-22 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/mediatek: Always tlb_flush_all when each PM resume Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-11-27 2:46 ` Yong Wu
2021-12-07 8:31 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-12-08 9:50 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-12-08 10:18 ` Dafna Hirschfeld [this message]
2021-11-22 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/mediatek: always check runtime PM status in tlb flush range callback Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-11-27 2:46 ` Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b246cd23-f19e-e3d9-a19e-2f598b6d1425@collabora.com \
--to=dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox