From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] iommu: Convert remaining simple drivers to domain_alloc_paging()
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 16:52:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9b6a50724b4f1ac2b98e518a8b9a820a912850f.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20-v1-21cc72fcfb22+a7a-iommu_all_defdom_jgg@nvidia.com>
On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 15:03 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> These drivers don't support IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA, so this commit effectively
> allows them to support that mode.
>
> The prior work to require default_domains makes this safe because every
> one of these drivers is either compilation incompatible with dma-iommu.c,
> or already establishing a default_domain. In both cases alloc_domain()
> will never be called with IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA for these drivers so it is safe
> to drop the test.
>
> Removing these tests clarifies that the domain allocation path is only
> about the functionality of a paging domain and has nothing to do with
> policy of how the paging domain is used for UNMANAGED/DMA/DMA_FQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 7 ++-----
> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
>
---8<---
> -static struct iommu_domain *s390_domain_alloc(unsigned domain_type)
> +static struct iommu_domain *s390_domain_alloc_paging(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct s390_domain *s390_domain;
>
> - if (domain_type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> - return NULL;
> -
> s390_domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*s390_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!s390_domain)
> return NULL;
> @@ -447,7 +444,7 @@ void zpci_destroy_iommu(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
> static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops = {
> .default_domain = &s390_iommu_platform_domain,
> .capable = s390_iommu_capable,
> - .domain_alloc = s390_domain_alloc,
> + .domain_alloc_paging = s390_domain_alloc_paging,
Leaving .domain_alloc unset here leads to an OOPs with your GitHub
branch (iommu_mandatory_default) when I try to use vfio-pci for KVM
pass-through via the following call chain:
...
vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl()
vfio_group_ioctl_set_container()
vfio_container_attach_group()
iommu_group_claim_dma_owner()
__iommu_take_dma_ownership()
__iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain()
__iommu_domain_alloc(…, IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED)
The problem is that in __iommu_domain_alloc() a call to bus->iommu_ops-
>domain_alloc() is attempted for IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLCOKED even if the
function pointer is unset.
So I tried with the obvious fix:
@@ -1947,7 +1948,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_domain_alloc(struct bus_type *bus,
if ((type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED || type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) &&
bus->iommu_ops->domain_alloc_paging)
domain = bus->iommu_ops->domain_alloc_paging(dev);
- else
+ else if (bus->iommu_ops->domain_alloc)
domain = bus->iommu_ops->domain_alloc(type);
if (!domain)
return NULL;
This then uses the fallback of an empty IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED and I
get a working device in the guest. Also tried hot unplug where the
device is taken over by the host again. I think with my DMA API
conversion patches we can support blocking domains properly but for a
temporary solution the above may be acceptable.
> .probe_device = s390_iommu_probe_device,
> .release_device = s390_iommu_release_device,
> .device_group = generic_device_group,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-02 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-01 18:02 [PATCH 00/20] iommu: Make default_domain's mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 01/20] iommu: Add IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 02/20] iommu/terga-gart: Replace set_platform_dma_ops() with IOMMU_DOMAIN_PLATFORM Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 9:17 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 11:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 12:01 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 14:43 ` Thierry Reding
2023-05-03 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-12 2:55 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-05-12 16:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-12 18:12 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-12 20:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 03/20] iommu/s390: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-02 17:57 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 04/20] iommu/fsl_pamu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 10:57 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 12:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 05/20] iommu: Allow an IDENTITY domain as the default_domain in ARM32 Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 13:50 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 14:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 06/20] iommu/exynos: Implement an IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 15:31 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-04 14:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 07/20] iommu/tegra-smmu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 08/20] iommu/tegra-smmu: Support DMA domains in tegra Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 09/20] iommu/omap: Implement an IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 10/20] iommu/msm: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 11/20] iommu/mtk_iommu_v1: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/20] iommu: Remove ops->set_platform_dma_ops() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 13/20] iommu/qcom_iommu: Add an IOMMU_IDENTITIY_DOMAIN Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 14/20] iommu/ipmmu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:02 ` [PATCH 15/20] iommu/mtk_iommu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH 16/20] iommu/sun50i: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 15:54 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 16:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH 17/20] iommu: Require a default_domain for all iommu drivers Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH 18/20] iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-03 17:17 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-03 19:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-04 12:35 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-05-04 13:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH 19/20] iommu: Convert simple drivers with DOMAIN_DMA to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH 20/20] iommu: Convert remaining simple drivers " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-02 14:52 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2023-05-02 15:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-02 18:02 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-05-01 21:34 ` [PATCH 00/20] iommu: Make default_domain's mandatory Heiko Stübner
2023-05-01 22:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-01 22:10 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9b6a50724b4f1ac2b98e518a8b9a820a912850f.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox