From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Yuzhang Luo <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add a fix for devices need extra dtlb flush
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:49:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc647ceb-b14b-dc5b-ba83-4f8befd188c5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221122034529.3311562-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
On 2022-11-22 03:45, Jacob Pan wrote:
> QAT devices on Intel Sapphire Rapids and Emerald Rapids has a defect in
> address translation service (ATS). These devices may inadvertently issue
> ATS invalidation completion before posted writes initiated with
> translated address that utilized translations matching the invalidation
> address range, violating the invalidation completion ordering.
>
> An additional device TLB invalidation is needed to ensure no more posted
> writes with translated address following the invalidation completion.
>
> Without this fix, DMA writes with translated address can happen after
> device TLB invalidation is completed. Random data corruption can occur
> as the DMA buffer gets reused after invalidation.
>
> This patch adds a flag to mark the need for an extra flush based on given
> device IDs, this flag is set during initialization when ATS support is
> enabled.
>
> At runtime, this flag is used to control the extra dTLB flush. The
> overhead of checking this unlikely true flag is smaller than checking
> PCI device IDs every time.
>
> Device TLBs are invalidated under the following six conditions:
> 1. Device driver does DMA API unmap IOVA
> 2. Device driver unbind a PASID from a process, sva_unbind_device()
> 3. PASID is torn down, after PASID cache is flushed. e.g. process
> exit_mmap() due to crash
> 4. Under SVA usage, called by mmu_notifier.invalidate_range() where
> VM has to free pages that were unmapped
> 5. userspace driver unmaps a DMA buffer
> 6. Cache invalidation in vSVA usage (upcoming)
>
> For #1 and #2, device drivers are responsible for stopping DMA traffic
> before unmap/unbind. For #3, iommu driver gets mmu_notifier to
> invalidate TLB the same way as normal user unmap which will do an extra
> invalidation. The dTLB invalidation after PASID cache flush does not
> need an extra invalidation.
>
> Therefore, we only need to deal with #4 and #5 in this patch. #1 is also
> covered by this patch due to common code path with #5.
>
> Tested-by: Yuzhang Luo <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 3 ++
> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 996a8b5ee5ee..6254788330b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -1396,6 +1396,39 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check that the device does not live on an external facing PCI port that is
> + * marked as untrusted. Such devices should not be able to apply quirks and
> + * thus not be able to bypass the IOMMU restrictions.
> + */
> +static bool risky_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (pdev->untrusted) {
> + pci_info(pdev,
> + "Skipping IOMMU quirk for dev [%04X:%04X] on untrusted PCI link\n",
> + pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
> + pci_info(pdev, "Please check with your BIOS/Platform vendor about this\n");
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Impacted QAT device IDs ranging from 0x4940 to 0x4943 */
> +#define BUGGY_QAT_DEVID_MASK 0x494c
> +static bool dev_needs_extra_dtlb_flush(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (pdev->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((pdev->device & 0xfffc) != BUGGY_QAT_DEVID_MASK)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (risky_device(pdev))
> + return false;
Hmm, I'm not sure that that makes much sense to me - what privilege can
the device gain from being told to invalidate things twice? Why would we
want to implicitly *allow* a device to potentially keep using a stale
translation if for some bizarre reason firmware has marked it as
external, surely that's worse?
Robin.
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void iommu_enable_pci_caps(struct device_domain_info *info)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> @@ -1478,6 +1511,7 @@ static void __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info,
> qdep = info->ats_qdep;
> qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> qdep, addr, mask);
> + quirk_dev_tlb(info, addr, mask, PASID_RID2PASID, qdep);
> }
>
> static void iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> @@ -4490,9 +4524,10 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
> pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
> - dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu))
> + dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu)) {
> info->ats_supported = 1;
> -
> + info->dtlb_extra_inval = dev_needs_extra_dtlb_flush(pdev);
> + }
> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
> if (pasid_supported(iommu)) {
> int features = pci_pasid_features(pdev);
> @@ -4680,23 +4715,6 @@ static bool intel_iommu_is_attach_deferred(struct device *dev)
> return translation_pre_enabled(info->iommu) && !info->domain;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Check that the device does not live on an external facing PCI port that is
> - * marked as untrusted. Such devices should not be able to apply quirks and
> - * thus not be able to bypass the IOMMU restrictions.
> - */
> -static bool risky_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> -{
> - if (pdev->untrusted) {
> - pci_info(pdev,
> - "Skipping IOMMU quirk for dev [%04X:%04X] on untrusted PCI link\n",
> - pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
> - pci_info(pdev, "Please check with your BIOS/Platform vendor about this\n");
> - return true;
> - }
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static void intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> {
> @@ -4931,3 +4949,47 @@ static void __init check_tylersburg_isoch(void)
> pr_warn("Recommended TLB entries for ISOCH unit is 16; your BIOS set %d\n",
> vtisochctrl);
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Here we deal with a device TLB defect where device may inadvertently issue ATS
> + * invalidation completion before posted writes initiated with translated address
> + * that utilized translations matching the invalidation address range, violating
> + * the invalidation completion ordering.
> + * Therefore, any use cases that cannot guarantee DMA is stopped before unmap is
> + * vulnerable to this defect. In other words, any dTLB invalidation initiated not
> + * under the control of the trusted/privileged host device driver must use this
> + * quirk.
> + * Device TLBs are invalidated under the following six conditions:
> + * 1. Device driver does DMA API unmap IOVA
> + * 2. Device driver unbind a PASID from a process, sva_unbind_device()
> + * 3. PASID is torn down, after PASID cache is flushed. e.g. process
> + * exit_mmap() due to crash
> + * 4. Under SVA usage, called by mmu_notifier.invalidate_range() where
> + * VM has to free pages that were unmapped
> + * 5. Userspace driver unmaps a DMA buffer
> + * 6. Cache invalidation in vSVA usage (upcoming)
> + *
> + * For #1 and #2, device drivers are responsible for stopping DMA traffic
> + * before unmap/unbind. For #3, iommu driver gets mmu_notifier to
> + * invalidate TLB the same way as normal user unmap which will use this quirk.
> + * The dTLB invalidation after PASID cache flush does not need this quirk.
> + *
> + * As a reminder, #6 will *NEED* this quirk as we enable nested translation.
> + */
> +void quirk_dev_tlb(struct device_domain_info *info, unsigned long address,
> + unsigned long mask, u32 pasid, u16 qdep)
> +{
> + u16 sid;
> +
> + if (likely(!info->dtlb_extra_inval))
> + return;
> +
> + sid = PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn);
> + if (pasid == PASID_RID2PASID) {
> + qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> + qdep, address, mask);
> + } else {
> + qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> + pasid, qdep, address, mask);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index 92023dff9513..09b989bf545f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct device_domain_info {
> u8 pri_enabled:1;
> u8 ats_supported:1;
> u8 ats_enabled:1;
> + u8 dtlb_extra_inval:1; /* Quirk for devices need extra flush */
> u8 ats_qdep;
> struct device *dev; /* it's NULL for PCIe-to-PCI bridge */
> struct intel_iommu *iommu; /* IOMMU used by this device */
> @@ -728,6 +729,8 @@ void qi_flush_piotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32 pasid, u64 addr,
> void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
> unsigned int size_order);
> +void quirk_dev_tlb(struct device_domain_info *info, unsigned long address,
> + unsigned long pages, u32 pasid, u16 qdep);
> void qi_flush_pasid_cache(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 granu,
> u32 pasid);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> index 7d08eb034f2d..117430b97ba9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> @@ -184,10 +184,12 @@ static void __flush_svm_range_dev(struct intel_svm *svm,
> return;
>
> qi_flush_piotlb(sdev->iommu, sdev->did, svm->pasid, address, pages, ih);
> - if (info->ats_enabled)
> + if (info->ats_enabled) {
> qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(sdev->iommu, sdev->sid, info->pfsid,
> svm->pasid, sdev->qdep, address,
> order_base_2(pages));
> + quirk_dev_tlb(info, address, order_base_2(pages), svm->pasid, sdev->qdep);
> + }
> }
>
> static void intel_flush_svm_range_dev(struct intel_svm *svm,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 3:45 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add a fix for devices need extra dtlb flush Jacob Pan
2022-11-22 16:52 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-28 16:13 ` Jacob Pan
2022-11-22 17:49 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-11-23 1:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-23 5:03 ` Baolu Lu
2022-11-23 5:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-23 11:32 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-24 2:52 ` Baolu Lu
2022-11-28 16:02 ` Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc647ceb-b14b-dc5b-ba83-4f8befd188c5@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhang.luo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox