From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.vger.org
Subject: Re: Question about domain_init (v5.3-v5.7)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:01:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd1fd204-3596-b16c-5617-7e691ceac83b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7pd6v2k.fsf@redhat.com>
Hi Jerry,
On 2020/11/26 4:27, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>
> Is there a reason we check the requested guest address width against the
> iommu's mgaw, instead of the agaw that we already know for the iommu?
> I've run into a case with a new system where the mgaw reported is 57,
> but if they set PAE to 46 instead of 52 in the bios, then sagaw reports
> the highest supported agaw is 48 and the domain_init code fails here. In
Isn't this a platform bug? If it's too late to fix it in the BIOS, you
maybe have to add a platform specific quirk to set mgaw to the highest
supported agaw?
Best regards,
baolu
> other places like prepare_domain_attach_device, the dmar domain agaw
> gets adjusted down to the iommu agaw. The agaw of the iommu gets
> determined based off what is reported for sagaw. I'm wondering if it
> can't instead do:
>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 6ca5c92ef2e5..a8e41ec36d9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -1862,8 +1862,8 @@ static int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> domain_reserve_special_ranges(domain);
>
> /* calculate AGAW */
> - if (guest_width > cap_mgaw(iommu->cap))
> - guest_width = cap_mgaw(iommu->cap);
> + if (guest_width > agaw_to_width(iommu->agaw))
> + guest_width = agaw_to_width(iommu->agaw);
> domain->gaw = guest_width;
> adjust_width = guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(guest_width);
> agaw = width_to_agaw(adjust_width);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
> Thoughts? With the former code the ehci device for the ilo fails when
> trying to get a private domain.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 20:27 Question about domain_init (v5.3-v5.7) Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-26 11:01 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2020-11-26 21:35 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-27 2:12 ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-27 7:48 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-30 17:50 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-30 18:03 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-01 2:37 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd1fd204-3596-b16c-5617-7e691ceac83b@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.vger.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox