From: Vasant Hegde <vashegde@amd.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Eric Wagner <ewagner12@gmail.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/amd: Enhance def_domain_type to handle untrusted device
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:41:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c255ccb1-68ac-485b-807e-a4c38786f116@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6552a5bb-0481-4a0c-a587-84275ab3a179@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 4/23/2024 4:56 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 23/04/2024 12:17 pm, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>> Previously, IOMMU core layer was forcing IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA domain for
>> untrusted device. This always took precedence over driver's
>> def_domain_type(). Commit 59ddce4418da ("iommu: Reorganize
>> iommu_get_default_domain_type() to respect def_domain_type()") changed
>> the behaviour. Current code calls def_domain_type() but if it doesn't
>> return IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA for untrusted device it throws error. This
>> results in IOMMU group (and potentially IOMMU itself) in undetermined
>> state.
>>
>> This patch adds untrusted check in AMD IOMMU driver code. So that it
>> allows eGPUs behind Thunderbolt work again.
>
> Sorry, but I firmly disagree with this approach - regardless of what the AMD
> driver is currently doing and how appropriate it may or may not be, we should
> not be duplicating core code policy in drivers, and we certainly shouldn't be
> doing so to bodge around a breakage in how the core code implements said policy.
Ack. I still think fixing in core layer (what your patch does) is the right fix.
@Joerg,
This is alternative to Robin's original patch [1]. If everyone agrees with
that fix then we don't need this patch.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/fa14583e94cbf540b60a6be94b41bb24d0037e75.1713272443.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/
-Vasant
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>> Fine tuning amd_iommu_def_domain_type() will be done later.
>>
>> Reported-by: Eric Wagner <ewagner12@gmail.com>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/CAHudX3zLH6CsRmLE-yb+gRjhh-v4bU5_1jW_xCcxOo_oUUZKYg@mail.gmail.com
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3182
>> Fixes: 59ddce4418da ("iommu: Reorganize iommu_get_default_domain_type() to
>> respect def_domain_type()")
>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v6.7+
>> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added dev_is_pci() check - Thanks Lu Baolu
>>
>> -Vasant
>>
>> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> index e692217fcb28..fb727f5b0b82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> @@ -2754,6 +2754,10 @@ static int amd_iommu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>> if (!dev_data)
>> return 0;
>> + /* Always use DMA domain for untrusted device */
>> + if (dev_is_pci(dev) && to_pci_dev(dev)->untrusted)
>> + return IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Do not identity map IOMMUv2 capable devices when:
>> * - memory encryption is active, because some of those devices
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 11:17 [PATCH v2] iommu/amd: Enhance def_domain_type to handle untrusted device Vasant Hegde
2024-04-23 11:26 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-24 8:11 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-04-24 13:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-26 10:11 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c255ccb1-68ac-485b-807e-a4c38786f116@amd.com \
--to=vashegde@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ewagner12@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox