Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: isaacm@codeaurora.org
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, pdaly@codeaurora.org,
	pratikp@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Prepare for modularization
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:54:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c35a517f25d88212ef4a14fdbef5f035@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <370f7c90-a3e3-57d9-1830-8abe5134e004@arm.com>

On 2020-12-21 07:22, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-12-18 18:59, isaacm@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2020-12-18 04:38, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-18 08:38, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote:
>>>> The io-pgtable-arm and io-pgtable-arm-v7s source files will
>>>> be compiled as separate modules, along with the io-pgtable
>>>> source. Export the symbols for the io-pgtable init function
>>>> structures for the io-pgtable module to use.
>>> 
>>> In my current build tree, the io-pgtable glue itself is a whopping 
>>> 379
>>> bytes of code and data - is there really any benefit to all the
>>> additional overhead of making that modular? Given the number of
>>> different users (including AMD now), I think at this point we should
>>> start considering this as part of the IOMMU core, and just tweak the
>>> interface such that formats can register their own init_fns
>>> dynamically instead of the static array that's always horrible.
>>> 
>>> Robin.
>>> 
>> Thanks for the feedback, Robin. This is an avenue I had explored a bit 
>> when modularizing the code. However,
>> I came up with a few problems that I couldn't get around.
>> 
>> 1) If we leave the io-pgtable glue as part of the core kernel, we need 
>> to ensure that the io-pgtable format
>> modules get loaded prior to any driver that might use them (e.g. IOMMU 
>> drivers/other callers of alloc_io_pgtable_ops).
>>      a) This can get a bit messy, as there's no symbol dependencies 
>> between the callers of the io-pgtable
>>         code, and the page table format modules, since everything is 
>> through function pointers. This is handled
>>         for the IOMMU drivers through the devlink feature, but I don't 
>> see how we can leverage something like that
>>         here. I guess this isn't too much of a problem when everything 
>> is built-in, as the registration can happen
>>         in one of the earlier initcall levels.
>> 
>>      b) If we do run into a scenario where a client of io-pgtable 
>> tries to allocate a page table instance prior
>>         to the io-pgtable format module being loaded, I couldn't come 
>> up with a way of distinguishing between
>>         format module is not available at the moment vs  format module 
>> will never be available. I don't think
>>         returning EPROBE_DEFER would be something nice to do in that 
>> case.
> 
> Urgh, I see... yes, the current approach does work out as an
> unexpectedly neat way to avoid many of the pitfalls. However I'm not
> sure it actually avoids all of them - say you have a config like this:
> 
> IPMMU_VMSA=y
> -> IO_PGTABLE_ARM_LPAE=y
>    -> IO_PGTABLE=y
> MTK_IOMMU=m
> -> IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S=m
> 
> won't that still fail to link io-pgtable.o?
> 
Yes, you are correct, that would be problematic.
>> 2) We would have to ensure that the format module cannot be unloaded 
>> while other clients are using it. I suppose
>> this isn't as big as point #1 though, since it's something that can 
>> probably be handled through a similar ref count
>> mechanism that we're using for modular IOMMU drivers.
> 
> FWIW I think that would come out in the wash from resolving 1b - I'd
> assume there would have to be some sort of module_get() in there
> somewhere. I should probably go and look at how the crypto API handles
> its modular algorithms for more inspiration...
So I looked through the crypto dir, and it seems like they--along with a 
few other kernel drivers--are using MODULE_SOFTDEP()
to sort out these dependencies.
> 
>> Given the two reasons above, I went with the current approach, since 
>> it avoids both issues by creating symbol dependencies
>> between client drivers, the io-pgtable drivers, and the io-pgtable 
>> format drivers, so that ensures that they are loaded
>> in the correct order, and also prevents them from being removed, 
>> unless there aren't any users present.
> 
> Having thought all that over, I'm now wondering what we really gain
> from this either way - if vendors can build and ship SoC-tailored
> configs, then they can already turn off formats they don't care about.
> If the aim is to ship a single config everywhere, then you'll still
> have to provision and load all possible formats on any system that
> needs any one of them, thanks to those "convenient" symbol
> dependencies. The promise in the cover letter doesn't seem to
> materialise :/
> 
> Robin.
> 
Given the feedback, this makes sense. I've come up with a second version 
of the patches that leaves
the io-pgtable code in the kernel, and allows the formats to be modules, 
which better achieves what
the cover-letter is trying to express :) I believe that with the second 
patch, we should be able to
get to a place where the kernel just needs to provide io-pgtable, while 
vendors can provide either
io-pgtable-arm or io-pgtable-arm-v7s or both, as needed.
Here are the patches: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/1608597876-32367-1-git-send-email-isaacm@codeaurora.org/T/#t

Thanks,
Isaac
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Isaac
>>>> Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 4 ++++
>>>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c     | 8 ++++++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c 
>>>> b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>>>> index 1d92ac9..f062c1c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>>>   #include <linux/iommu.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/sizes.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>>> @@ -839,6 +840,7 @@ struct io_pgtable_init_fns 
>>>> io_pgtable_arm_v7s_init_fns = {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_v7s_alloc_pgtable,
>>>>       .free    = arm_v7s_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_v7s_init_fns);
>>>>     #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S_SELFTEST
>>>>   @@ -984,3 +986,5 @@ static int __init arm_v7s_do_selftests(void)
>>>>   }
>>>>   subsys_initcall(arm_v7s_do_selftests);
>>>>   #endif
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c 
>>>> b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>>>> index 87def58..2623d57 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>>>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>>>   #include <linux/bitops.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/io-pgtable.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/sizes.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/types.h>
>>>> @@ -1047,26 +1048,31 @@ struct io_pgtable_init_fns 
>>>> io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s1_init_fns = {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1,
>>>>       .free    = arm_lpae_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s1_init_fns);
>>>>     struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s2_init_fns = 
>>>> {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s2,
>>>>       .free    = arm_lpae_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s2_init_fns);
>>>>     struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s1_init_fns = 
>>>> {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_32_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1,
>>>>       .free    = arm_lpae_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s1_init_fns);
>>>>     struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s2_init_fns = 
>>>> {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_32_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s2,
>>>>       .free    = arm_lpae_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s2_init_fns);
>>>>     struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_mali_lpae_init_fns = {
>>>>       .alloc    = arm_mali_lpae_alloc_pgtable,
>>>>       .free    = arm_lpae_free_pgtable,
>>>>   };
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_pgtable_arm_mali_lpae_init_fns);
>>>>     #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE_SELFTEST
>>>>   @@ -1252,3 +1258,5 @@ static int __init 
>>>> arm_lpae_do_selftests(void)
>>>>   }
>>>>   subsys_initcall(arm_lpae_do_selftests);
>>>>   #endif
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18  8:38 [RFC PATCH 0/3] iommu: Permit modular builds of io-pgtable drivers Isaac J. Manjarres
2020-12-18  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Prepare for modularization Isaac J. Manjarres
2020-12-18 12:38   ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-18 18:59     ` isaacm
2020-12-21 15:22       ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-22  0:54         ` isaacm [this message]
2020-12-18  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/io-pgtable: " Isaac J. Manjarres
2020-12-18  8:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/io-pgtable: Allow building as a module Isaac J. Manjarres

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c35a517f25d88212ef4a14fdbef5f035@codeaurora.org \
    --to=isaacm@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pdaly@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pratikp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox