From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate dmar state management and force_on logic
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:00:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6ddabae-09ee-4101-94ca-d077514bae5a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604051540.592925-5-kevin.tian@intel.com>
On 6/4/26 13:15, Kevin Tian wrote:
> Currently the dmar state is carried by multiple variables (no_iommu,
> dmar_disabled, no_platform_optin, etc.) with error-prone force_on logic
> scattered in multiple places.
>
> Unify the state management and centralize the policy/priority for
> various force_on scenarios.
>
> No functional impact except one case - "intel_iommu=off" sets
> no_platform_optin which is checked in platform_optin_force_iommu()
> but not in detect_intel_iommu(), leading to ACS unnecessarily requested
> when iommu could not be forced on later. Now with the unified logic
> this becomes more consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 +++++
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> index e8f01e56cf46..791b91a7be29 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -915,14 +915,60 @@ dmar_validate_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_header *entry, void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Centralized helper for deciding the force_on policy
> + *
> + * dmar disabled states (for DMA Remapping) are defined from stronger
> + * disables (more negative values) to weaker disables (less negative
> + * values).
> + *
> + * When a force_on type is passed in, it is associated to a reference
> + * level for comparison. force_on is permitted when dmar is in a
> + * disabled state less negative than the reference level (if dmar is
> + * enabled then the check is always true).
> + *
> + * For supported force_on types:
> + *
> + * - DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT: tboot strictly requires DMA remapping for secure
> + * boot hence supersedes any user opts ("iommu=off" or "intel_iommu=off")
> + * and weaker disables.
> + *
> + * - DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM: external-facing devices requires DMA
> + * remapping to prevent malicious downstream external devices from
> + * composing DMA attacks. force_on is permitted only if dmar is disabled
> + * by build configurations (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=off).
> + */
> +bool dmar_can_force_on(enum dmar_force_on force_on)
> +{
> + int level;
> +
> + switch (force_on) {
> + case DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT:
> + level = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
> + break;
> + case DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM:
> + level = DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("Unsupported force_on type (%d)\n", force_on);
> + /* '0' means returning true only when dmar is enabled */
> + level = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return dmar_state >= level;
> +}
> +
> static bool dmar_required(void)
> {
> - /* tboot supersedes any user/platform opt */
> - if (!intel_iommu_tboot_noforce && tboot_enabled())
> + if (dmar_is_enabled())
> return true;
>
> - if (!no_iommu && (!dmar_disabled || dmar_platform_optin()))
> - return true;
> + if (!intel_iommu_tboot_noforce && tboot_enabled())
> + return dmar_can_force_on(DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT);
> +
> + if (dmar_platform_optin())
> + return dmar_can_force_on(DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM);
>
> return false;
> }
> @@ -936,6 +982,9 @@ void __init detect_intel_iommu(void)
> };
>
> down_write(&dmar_global_lock);
> + if (no_iommu)
> + dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
> +
> ret = dmar_table_detect();
> if (!ret)
> ret = dmar_walk_dmar_table((struct acpi_table_dmar *)dmar_tbl,
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 0365ff4e5092..0fc131a34963 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
>
> static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON
> +int dmar_state = DMAR_ENABLED;
> +#else
> +int dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO;
> +#endif
> int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
> int intel_iommu_sm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON);
>
> @@ -237,9 +242,11 @@ static int __init intel_iommu_setup(char *str)
>
> while (*str) {
> if (!strncmp(str, "on", 2)) {
> + dmar_state = DMAR_ENABLED;
> dmar_disabled = 0;
> pr_info("IOMMU enabled\n");
> } else if (!strncmp(str, "off", 3)) {
> + dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
> dmar_disabled = 1;
> no_platform_optin = 1;
> pr_info("IOMMU disabled\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index bb8b973476f6..1acc393dafce 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -1340,6 +1340,51 @@ static inline bool ecmd_has_pmu_essential(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> DMA_ECMD_ECCAP3_ESSENTIAL;
> }
>
> +enum dmar_force_on {
> + DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM,
> + DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Enabled states are positive, with more positive value being stronger.
> + * Disabled states are negative, with more negative value being stronger.
> + *
> + * 'dmar' here refers to DMA remapping instead of the dmar/iommu unit.
> + *
> + * - DMAR_ENABLED_FORCE:
> + * force enabled (e.g. by tboot or platform optin).
> + *
> + * - DMAR_ENABLED:
> + * enabled by build configuration (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=on)
> + * or user opts ("intel_iommu=on").
> + *
> + * - DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO
> + * disabled by build configuration (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=off).
> + *
> + * - DMAR_DISABLED_USER
> + * disabled by user opts ("intel_iommu=off" or "iommu=off").
> + *
> + * - '0' is invalid, compared to decide dmar enabled vs. disabled
> + *
> + */
> +#define DMAR_ENABLED_FORCE 2
> +#define DMAR_ENABLED 1
> +#define DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO -1
> +#define DMAR_DISABLED_USER -2
> +extern int dmar_state;
> +
> +static inline bool dmar_is_enabled(void)
> +{
> + return dmar_state > 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool dmar_is_disabled(void)
> +{
> + return dmar_state < 0;
> +}
The helpers above seem to conflict with:
extern int intel_iommu_enabled;
Can we possibly make the interface consistent?
> +
> +bool dmar_can_force_on(enum dmar_force_on force_on);
> +
> extern int dmar_disabled;
> extern int intel_iommu_enabled;
> extern int intel_iommu_tboot_noforce;
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 5:15 [PATCH 0/9] iommu/vt-d: Support a new DMAR flag Kevin Tian
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] iommu/vt-d: Fix no_iommu to disable platform optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] iommu/vt-d: Force requesting ACS when tboot is enabled Kevin Tian
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove dead code when CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU is not set Kevin Tian
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate dmar state management and force_on logic Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 11:08 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17 7:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-15 5:00 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-06-17 7:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommu/vt-d: Use dmar_can_force_on() for platform optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 13:16 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17 7:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommu/vt-d: Call dmar_can_force_on() for tboot optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 13:57 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17 7:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove the 'force_on' variable Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 14:16 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17 7:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_disabled Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 14:26 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17 7:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Support the new DMA_REMAP_OPT_OUT flag bit Kevin Tian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6ddabae-09ee-4101-94ca-d077514bae5a@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox