Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate dmar state management and force_on logic
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:00:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6ddabae-09ee-4101-94ca-d077514bae5a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604051540.592925-5-kevin.tian@intel.com>

On 6/4/26 13:15, Kevin Tian wrote:
> Currently the dmar state is carried by multiple variables (no_iommu,
> dmar_disabled, no_platform_optin, etc.) with error-prone force_on logic
> scattered in multiple places.
> 
> Unify the state management and centralize the policy/priority for
> various force_on scenarios.
> 
> No functional impact except one case - "intel_iommu=off" sets
> no_platform_optin which is checked in platform_optin_force_iommu()
> but not in detect_intel_iommu(), leading to ACS unnecessarily requested
> when iommu could not be forced on later. Now with the unified logic
> this becomes more consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c |  7 +++++
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> index e8f01e56cf46..791b91a7be29 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -915,14 +915,60 @@ dmar_validate_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_header *entry, void *arg)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Centralized helper for deciding the force_on policy
> + *
> + * dmar disabled states (for DMA Remapping) are defined from stronger
> + * disables (more negative values) to weaker disables (less negative
> + * values).
> + *
> + * When a force_on type is passed in, it is associated to a reference
> + * level for comparison. force_on is permitted when dmar is in a
> + * disabled state less negative than the reference level (if dmar is
> + * enabled then the check is always true).
> + *
> + * For supported force_on types:
> + *
> + * - DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT: tboot strictly requires DMA remapping for secure
> + *   boot hence supersedes any user opts ("iommu=off" or "intel_iommu=off")
> + *   and weaker disables.
> + *
> + * - DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM: external-facing devices requires DMA
> + *   remapping to prevent malicious downstream external devices from
> + *   composing DMA attacks. force_on is permitted only if dmar is disabled
> + *   by build configurations (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=off).
> + */
> +bool dmar_can_force_on(enum dmar_force_on force_on)
> +{
> +	int level;
> +
> +	switch (force_on) {
> +	case DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT:
> +		level = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
> +		break;
> +	case DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM:
> +		level = DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		pr_warn("Unsupported force_on type (%d)\n", force_on);
> +		/* '0' means returning true only when dmar is enabled */
> +		level = 0;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return dmar_state >= level;
> +}
> +
>   static bool dmar_required(void)
>   {
> -	/* tboot supersedes any user/platform opt */
> -	if (!intel_iommu_tboot_noforce && tboot_enabled())
> +	if (dmar_is_enabled())
>   		return true;
>   
> -	if (!no_iommu && (!dmar_disabled || dmar_platform_optin()))
> -		return true;
> +	if (!intel_iommu_tboot_noforce && tboot_enabled())
> +		return dmar_can_force_on(DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT);
> +
> +	if (dmar_platform_optin())
> +		return dmar_can_force_on(DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM);
>   
>   	return false;
>   }
> @@ -936,6 +982,9 @@ void __init detect_intel_iommu(void)
>   	};
>   
>   	down_write(&dmar_global_lock);
> +	if (no_iommu)
> +		dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
> +
>   	ret = dmar_table_detect();
>   	if (!ret)
>   		ret = dmar_walk_dmar_table((struct acpi_table_dmar *)dmar_tbl,
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 0365ff4e5092..0fc131a34963 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
>   
>   static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON
> +int dmar_state = DMAR_ENABLED;
> +#else
> +int dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO;
> +#endif
>   int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
>   int intel_iommu_sm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON);
>   
> @@ -237,9 +242,11 @@ static int __init intel_iommu_setup(char *str)
>   
>   	while (*str) {
>   		if (!strncmp(str, "on", 2)) {
> +			dmar_state = DMAR_ENABLED;
>   			dmar_disabled = 0;
>   			pr_info("IOMMU enabled\n");
>   		} else if (!strncmp(str, "off", 3)) {
> +			dmar_state = DMAR_DISABLED_USER;
>   			dmar_disabled = 1;
>   			no_platform_optin = 1;
>   			pr_info("IOMMU disabled\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index bb8b973476f6..1acc393dafce 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -1340,6 +1340,51 @@ static inline bool ecmd_has_pmu_essential(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>   		DMA_ECMD_ECCAP3_ESSENTIAL;
>   }
>   
> +enum dmar_force_on {
> +	DMAR_FORCEON_PLATFORM,
> +	DMAR_FORCEON_TBOOT
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Enabled states are positive, with more positive value being stronger.
> + * Disabled states are negative, with more negative value being stronger.
> + *
> + * 'dmar' here refers to DMA remapping instead of the dmar/iommu unit.
> + *
> + * - DMAR_ENABLED_FORCE:
> + *     force enabled (e.g. by tboot or platform optin).
> + *
> + * - DMAR_ENABLED:
> + *     enabled by build configuration (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=on)
> + *     or user opts ("intel_iommu=on").
> + *
> + * - DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO
> + *     disabled by build configuration (CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON=off).
> + *
> + * - DMAR_DISABLED_USER
> + *     disabled by user opts ("intel_iommu=off" or "iommu=off").
> + *
> + * - '0' is invalid, compared to decide dmar enabled vs. disabled
> + *
> + */
> +#define DMAR_ENABLED_FORCE	2
> +#define DMAR_ENABLED		1
> +#define DMAR_DISABLED_AUTO	-1
> +#define DMAR_DISABLED_USER	-2
> +extern int dmar_state;
> +
> +static inline bool dmar_is_enabled(void)
> +{
> +	return dmar_state > 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool dmar_is_disabled(void)
> +{
> +	return dmar_state < 0;
> +}

The helpers above seem to conflict with:

	extern int intel_iommu_enabled;

Can we possibly make the interface consistent?

> +
> +bool dmar_can_force_on(enum dmar_force_on force_on);
> +
>   extern int dmar_disabled;
>   extern int intel_iommu_enabled;
>   extern int intel_iommu_tboot_noforce;

Thanks,
baolu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04  5:15 [PATCH 0/9] iommu/vt-d: Support a new DMAR flag Kevin Tian
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] iommu/vt-d: Fix no_iommu to disable platform optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] iommu/vt-d: Force requesting ACS when tboot is enabled Kevin Tian
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove dead code when CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU is not set Kevin Tian
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate dmar state management and force_on logic Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 11:08   ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17  7:05     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-15  5:00   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-06-17  7:14     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommu/vt-d: Use dmar_can_force_on() for platform optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 13:16   ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17  7:17     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommu/vt-d: Call dmar_can_force_on() for tboot optin Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 13:57   ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17  7:19     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove the 'force_on' variable Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 14:16   ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17  7:22     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_disabled Kevin Tian
2026-06-12 14:26   ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-17  7:23     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-04  5:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Support the new DMA_REMAP_OPT_OUT flag bit Kevin Tian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6ddabae-09ee-4101-94ca-d077514bae5a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox