From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lu Baolu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Check whether device requires bounce buffer Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:35:51 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20190421011719.14909-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190421011719.14909-9-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190422164755.GC31181@lst.de> <76e35340-32c3-ee0d-5232-bd8800248402@linux.intel.com> <20190423060858.GA12762@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190423060858.GA12762@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, David Woodhouse , Joerg Roedel , ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, pengfei.xu@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Pan List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi, On 4/23/19 2:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Again, this and the option should not be in a specific iommu driver. >>> >> >> The option of whether bounce is ignored should be in the specific iommu >> driver. > > Why? As a user I could not care less which IOMMU driver my particular > system uses. > Looks reasonable to me. Let's listen to more opinions. Best regards, Lu Baolu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE9DC282DD for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDC920645 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:42:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFDC920645 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95274C3A; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF00C37 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:42:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC45E829 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:42:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2019 00:42:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,385,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="339939624" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.136]) ([10.239.159.136]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2019 00:42:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Check whether device requires bounce buffer To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20190421011719.14909-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190421011719.14909-9-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190422164755.GC31181@lst.de> <76e35340-32c3-ee0d-5232-bd8800248402@linux.intel.com> <20190423060858.GA12762@lst.de> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:35:51 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190423060858.GA12762@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , alan.cox@intel.com, Robin Murphy , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pengfei.xu@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Message-ID: <20190423073551.3gJ_ELvzUC8LCCp-iOoqEMEUQO35owpcOPPxu8skkJM@z> Hi, On 4/23/19 2:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Again, this and the option should not be in a specific iommu driver. >>> >> >> The option of whether bounce is ignored should be in the specific iommu >> driver. > > Why? As a user I could not care less which IOMMU driver my particular > system uses. > Looks reasonable to me. Let's listen to more opinions. Best regards, Lu Baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu