From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 12/26] vfio/pci: Change the DMA-buf exporter to use mapping_type
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:29:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4e2171a-da58-488f-be02-26a39b5afbe3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nvidia.com>
On 2/18/26 08:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Simple conversion to add a match_mapping() callback that offers an
> exporter SGT mapping type. Later patches will add a physical address
> exporter so go straight to adding the match_mapping() function.
>
> The check for attachment->peer2peer is replaced with setting
> exporter_requires_p2p=true. VFIO always uses MMIO memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> index d4d0f7d08c53e2..c7addef5794abf 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> {
> struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = dmabuf->priv;
>
> - if (!attachment->peer2peer)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> if (priv->revoked)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -75,11 +72,35 @@ static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> kfree(priv);
> }
>
> -static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
> - .attach = vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach,
> +static const struct dma_buf_mapping_sgt_exp_ops vfio_pci_dma_buf_sgt_ops = {
> .map_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_map,
> .unmap_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unmap,
> +};
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_match_mapping(struct dma_buf_match_args *args)
> +{
> + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = args->dmabuf->priv;
> + struct dma_buf_mapping_match sgt_match[1];
> +
> + dma_resv_assert_held(priv->dmabuf->resv);
My understanding of this lock assertion is that priv and the underlying
priv->vdev are accessed within this function. Therefore, the lock is
necessary to protect them. Do I understand it right?
However, callers - for example, dma_buf_mapping_attach() - do not
acquire dma_resv_lock() before calling this function. So kernel traces
will always be triggered.
> +
> + /*
> + * Once we pass vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() the dmabuf will never be
> + * usable again.
> + */
> + if (!priv->vdev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + sgt_match[0] = DMA_BUF_EMAPPING_SGT_P2P(&vfio_pci_dma_buf_sgt_ops,
> + priv->vdev->pdev);
> +
> + return dma_buf_match_mapping(args, sgt_match, ARRAY_SIZE(sgt_match));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
> + .attach = vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach,
> .release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release,
> + .match_mapping = vfio_pci_dma_buf_match_mapping,
> };
>
> /*
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 0:11 [PATCH RFC 00/26] Add DMA-buf mapping types and convert vfio/iommufd to use them Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 01/26] dma-buf: Introduce DMA-buf mapping types Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 02/26] dma-buf: Add the SGT DMA mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 03/26] dma-buf: Add dma_buf_mapping_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 04/26] dma-buf: Route SGT related actions through attach->map_type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 05/26] dma-buf: Allow single exporter drivers to avoid the match_mapping function Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 06/26] drm: Check the SGT ops for drm_gem_map_dma_buf() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 07/26] dma-buf: Convert all the simple exporters to use SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 08/26] drm/vmwgfx: Use match_mapping instead of dummy calls Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 09/26] accel/habanalabs: Use the SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 10/26] drm/xe/dma-buf: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 11/26] drm/amdgpu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 12/26] vfio/pci: Change the DMA-buf exporter to use mapping_type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-13 8:29 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-04-13 13:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 13/26] dma-buf: Update dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt() to use the SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 14/26] iio: buffer: convert " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 15/26] functionfs: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 16/26] dma-buf: Remove unused SGT stuff from the common structures Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 17/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_map_attachment(_unlocked) to dma_buf_sgt_ Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 18/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_unmap_attachment(_unlocked) to dma_buf_sgt_* Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 19/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_attach() to dma_buf_sgt_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 20/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_dynamic_attach() to dma_buf_sgt_dynamic_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 21/26] dma-buf: Add the Physical Address List DMA mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-13 8:58 ` Christian König
2026-04-13 12:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 22/26] vfio/pci: Add physical address list support to DMABUF Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 23/26] iommufd: Use the PAL mapping type instead of a vfio function Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 24/26] iommufd: Support DMA-bufs with multiple physical ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 25/26] iommufd/selftest: Check multi-phys DMA-buf scenarios Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18 0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 26/26] dma-buf: Add kunit tests for mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-01 19:05 ` [PATCH RFC 00/26] Add DMA-buf mapping types and convert vfio/iommufd to use them Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-03 7:07 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4e2171a-da58-488f-be02-26a39b5afbe3@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dongwon.kim@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox