From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down context entry
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 16:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5b1aa1a-5d20-40c8-9f3f-5bc37766fe75@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR11MB5271D3AE08DAF677E44449B78C96A@BL1PR11MB5271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 1/21/26 15:50, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 3:29 PM
>>
>> On 1/21/26 14:23, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 2:18 PM
>>>>
>>>> When tearing down a context entry, the current implementation zeros
>> the
>>>> entire 128-bit entry using multiple 64-bit writes. This creates a window
>>>> where the hardware can fetch a "torn" entry — where some fields are
>>>> already zeroed while the 'Present' bit is still set — leading to
>>>> unpredictable behavior or spurious faults.
>>>>
>>>> While x86 provides strong write ordering, the compiler may reorder
>> writes
>>>> to the two 64-bit halves of the context entry. Even without compiler
>>>> reordering, the hardware fetch is not guaranteed to be atomic with
>>>> respect to multiple CPU writes.
>>>>
>>>> Align with the "Guidance to Software for Invalidations" in the VT-d spec
>>>> (Section 6.5.3.3) by implementing the recommended ownership
>> handshake:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Clear only the 'Present' (P) bit of the context entry first to
>>>> signal the transition of ownership from hardware to software.
>>>> 2. Use dma_wmb() to ensure the cleared bit is visible to the IOMMU.
>>>> 3. Perform the required cache and context-cache invalidation to ensure
>>>> hardware no longer has cached references to the entry.
>>>> 4. Fully zero out the entry only after the invalidation is complete.
>>>>
>>>> Also, add a dma_wmb() to context_set_present() to ensure the entry
>>>> is fully initialized before the 'Present' bit becomes visible.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ba39592764ed2 ("Intel IOMMU: Intel IOMMU driver")
>>>> Reported-by: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>
>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTG7gc7I5wExai3S@google.com/
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>>>
>>> btw there is a context_clear_entry() for copied context entry in
>>> device_pasid_table_setup(), but this patch doesn't touch that
>>> path. It seems to assume that no in-flight DMA will exist at that
>>> point:
>>>
>>> if (context_copied(iommu, bus, devfn)) {
>>> context_clear_entry(context);
>>> ...
>>> /*
>>> * At this point, the device is supposed to finish reset at
>>> * its driver probe stage, so no in-flight DMA will exist,
>>> * and we don't need to worry anymore hereafter.
>>> */
>>> clear_context_copied(iommu, bus, devfn);
>>>
>>> Is that guaranteed by all devices? from kdump feature p.o.v. if
>>> that assumption is broken it just means potential DMA errors
>>> in this transition window. But regarding to the issue which this
>>> patch tries to fix, in-fly DMAs may lead to undesired behaviors
>>> including memory corruption etc.
>>>
>>> So, should it be fixed too?
>>
>> This path is triggered when the device driver has probed the device
>> (ensuring it has been reset) and then calls the kernel DMA API for the
>> first time. At this stage, there should be no in-flight DMAs. We can
>> apply the same logic here to improve code readability, but this is not a
>> bug that requires a fix. Or not?
>>
>
> device could be in whatever state when kdump is triggered. I'm not
> sure whether all device drivers will reset the device at probe time.
Okay, agreed.
> Just thought that applying the same due diligence here could prevent
> any undesired damage just in case. Not exactly for backporting, but
> it's always good to have consistent logic to avoid special case based
> on subtle assumptions...
So I will add the following additional change:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
index 34f4af4e9b5c..b63a71904cfb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static int device_pasid_table_setup(struct device
*dev, u8 bus, u8 devfn)
}
if (context_copied(iommu, bus, devfn)) {
- context_clear_entry(context);
+ context_clear_present(context);
__iommu_flush_cache(iommu, context, sizeof(*context));
/*
@@ -860,6 +860,9 @@ static int device_pasid_table_setup(struct device
*dev, u8 bus, u8 devfn)
iommu->flush.flush_iotlb(iommu, 0, 0, 0,
DMA_TLB_GLOBAL_FLUSH);
devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(iommu, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
+ context_clear_entry(context);
+ __iommu_flush_cache(iommu, context, sizeof(*context));
+
/*
* At this point, the device is supposed to finish reset at
* its driver probe stage, so no in-flight DMA will exist,
Appears good to you?
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 6:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/vt-d: Ensure atomicity in context and PASID entry updates Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down PASID entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 13:56 ` Dmytro Maluka
2026-01-20 18:14 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down context entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 14:07 ` Dmytro Maluka
2026-01-20 18:22 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-21 7:28 ` Baolu Lu
2026-01-21 7:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-21 8:04 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-01-21 8:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/vt-d: Fix race condition during PASID entry replacement Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 18:54 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/vt-d: Ensure atomicity in context and PASID entry updates Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5b1aa1a-5d20-40c8-9f3f-5bc37766fe75@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmaluka@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox