From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FE63C1C
	for <iommu@lists.linux.dev>; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 13:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
  d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
  t=1659275116; x=1690811116;
  h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references:
   from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
  bh=xNdwAlr0T5czk0DQzyHKqrvhr3p3s9DnZNkOQ3z8kb0=;
  b=GSHmNnKDOfQBw63ROq31HdZ1dATgWMfJvx4f2+QbtInAsk4s9I7gPVNA
   LcX4z4V4zaobZ/IE2Tffl2Yy2J8i5ihYhNZfHlKWlKFeUcwQttuwizxxa
   +aBzK1n9X8GTdbdlMzr667j+Impoii36QZnXQpuObc3oh5Y1ldca+yNsJ
   dOJpiG8eR/1ICYiVG60IZG4DTRAtX7asOr4ffmZIovS5cfjVi20uAkEkN
   ZFwJuzbhaab4I8tAqZjyaP8yPEXjovCsrw60YXNpaGGalskk5H0NUu8PC
   2t3pa09RLVrz9tnZhRzjYjFXXS4gWOf8lsDZTmXJow6TfZjuPe/ywkpy+
   A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10425"; a="350703062"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,206,1654585200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="350703062"
Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65])
  by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jul 2022 06:45:16 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,206,1654585200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="629932115"
Received: from blu2-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.208.191]) ([10.254.208.191])
  by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jul 2022 06:45:11 -0700
Message-ID: <f6f58760-d352-37e1-beac-b1213e4500b0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 21:45:09 +0800
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <iommu.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:iommu+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iommu+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
 Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
 Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@intel.com>,
 iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/12] iommu/sva: Refactoring
 iommu_sva_bind/unbind_device()
Content-Language: en-US
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
 Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
References: <20220705050710.2887204-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20220705050710.2887204-9-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <7e9e61e0-bc8a-a757-a666-0a7828b7fde8@intel.com>
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <7e9e61e0-bc8a-a757-a666-0a7828b7fde8@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2022/7/31 20:36, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/7/5 13:07, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The existing iommu SVA interfaces are implemented by calling the SVA
>> specific iommu ops provided by the IOMMU drivers. There's no need for
>> any SVA specific ops in iommu_ops vector anymore as we can achieve
>> this through the generic attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops.
> 
> s/"attach/detach_dev_pasid"/"set/block_pasid_dev"/

Updated. By the way, as discussed, block_pasid_dev will be dropped since
the next version. It's actually setting group's blocking domain.

Best regards,
baolu