public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: provide reasonable defaults for tool coverage
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:35:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e8dee26-41cc-41ae-9493-10cd1a8e3268@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240506133544.2861555-2-masahiroy@kernel.org>

On Mon, May 6, 2024, at 15:35, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The objtool, sanitizers (KASAN, UBSAN, etc.), and profilers (GCOV, etc.)
> are intended for kernel space objects. To exclude objects from their
> coverage, you need to set variables such as OBJECT_FILES_NON_STNDARD=y,
> KASAN_SANITIZE=n, etc.
>
> For instance, the following are not kernel objects, and therefore should
> opt out of coverage:
>
>   - vDSO
>   - purgatory
>   - bootloader (arch/*/boot/)
>
> Kbuild can detect these cases without relying on such variables because
> objects not directly linked to vmlinux or modules are considered
> "non-standard objects".
>
> Detecting objects linked to vmlinux or modules is straightforward:
>
>   - objects added to obj-y are linked to vmlinux
>   - objects added to lib-y are linked to vmlinux
>   - objects added to obj-m are linked to modules
>

I noticed new randconfig build warnings and bisected them
down to this patch:

warning: unsafe memchr_inv() usage lacked '__read_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow-memchr_inv.c
warning: unsafe memchr() usage lacked '__read_overflow' warning in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow-memchr.c
warning: unsafe memscan() usage lacked '__read_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow-memscan.c
warning: unsafe memcmp() usage lacked '__read_overflow' warning in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow-memcmp.c
warning: unsafe memcpy() usage lacked '__read_overflow2' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow2-memcpy.c
warning: unsafe memcmp() usage lacked '__read_overflow2' warning in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow2-memcmp.c
warning: unsafe memmove() usage lacked '__read_overflow2' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow2-memmove.c
warning: unsafe memcpy() usage lacked '__read_overflow2_field' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow2_field-memcpy.c
warning: unsafe memmove() usage lacked '__read_overflow2_field' symbol in lib/test_fortify/read_overflow2_field-memmove.c
warning: unsafe memcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-memcpy.c
warning: unsafe memmove() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-memmove.c
warning: unsafe memset() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-memset.c
warning: unsafe strcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strcpy-lit.c
warning: unsafe strcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strcpy.c
warning: unsafe strncpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strncpy-src.c
warning: unsafe strncpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strncpy.c
warning: unsafe strscpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strscpy.c
warning: unsafe memcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow_field' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow_field-memcpy.c
warning: unsafe memmove() usage lacked '__write_overflow_field' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow_field-memmove.c
warning: unsafe memset() usage lacked '__write_overflow_field' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow_field-memset.c

I don't understand the nature of this warning, but I see
that your patch ended up dropping -fsanitize=kernel-address
from the compiler flags because the lib/test_fortify/*.c files
don't match the $(is-kernel-object) rule. Adding back
-fsanitize=kernel-address shuts up these warnings.

I've applied a local workaround in my randconfig tree

diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index ddcb76b294b5..d7b8fab64068 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -425,5 +425,7 @@ $(obj)/$(TEST_FORTIFY_LOG): $(addprefix $(obj)/, $(TEST_FORTIFY_LOGS)) FORCE
 
 # Fake dependency to trigger the fortify tests.
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE),y)
+ifndef CONFIG_KASAN
 $(obj)/string.o: $(obj)/$(TEST_FORTIFY_LOG)
+endif
 endif


which I don't think we want upstream. Can you and Kees come
up with a proper fix instead?

     Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-06 13:35 [PATCH 0/3] kbuild: remove many tool coverage variables Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-06 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: provide reasonable defaults for tool coverage Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-28 11:35   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-05-31  8:52     ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-31  9:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-31 10:16         ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-31 16:09           ` Kees Cook
2024-05-06 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: remove redundant tool coverage variables Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-06 13:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: use GCOV_PROFILE and KCSAN_SANITIZE in scripts/Makefile.modfinal Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-13 18:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] kbuild: remove many tool coverage variables Kees Cook
2024-05-13 19:54   ` Marco Elver
2024-05-13 22:50     ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-13 22:39   ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-13 23:28     ` Kees Cook
2024-05-14  7:31   ` Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e8dee26-41cc-41ae-9493-10cd1a8e3268@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox