From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51181 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753551AbZBVLnO (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:43:14 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/markers: make markers select tracepoints From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20090220172241.GF24538@elte.hu> References: <499edf47.1818d00a.060b.2b8d@mx.google.com> <499EE162.4050008@oracle.com> <20090220172241.GF24538@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:43:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1235302980.4632.8.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Randy Dunlap , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 18:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Eventually we should eliminate markers, their uses can either be > converted to new-style tracepoints, or to ftrace_printk(). I would like to never merge an ftrace_printk() user... just as I'd like to get rid of every marker. Then again, some people appear happy to commit their printk debug spree too :/