From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51601 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752391AbZBVMOs (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:14:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/markers: make markers select tracepoints From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <499edf47.1818d00a.060b.2b8d@mx.google.com> <499EE162.4050008@oracle.com> <20090220172241.GF24538@elte.hu> <1235302980.4632.8.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:14:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1235304876.4632.10.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Randy Dunlap , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 07:08 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > I would like to never merge an ftrace_printk() user... just as I'd like > > to get rid of every marker. > > But why? They solve a problem well enough that Ingo had in effect > reinvented them on Friday. Because after a printk() debug spree, I don't commit them, I toss them out and keep the fix.