* [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files
@ 2009-04-09 20:42 Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-10 3:28 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-10 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2009-04-09 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kbuild, LKML, Ingo Molnar
We have at several occasions discussed if our header files
should include their dependencies or not.
But we were lacking a tool to tell us if our header files
included the headerfiles they needed or not.
headercheck can be used to do so.
headercheck use the existing Kbuild files in
include/ to determine which directories to visit.
And for each directory it create one .c file for each
.h file and build it.
A .c file looks like this:
$cat module.h.c
#include <linux/module.h>
Building this file will tell us if module.h is
missing any dependencies (but NOT if it has too many) with
the current configuration.
We know that some header files are simply NOT supposed to be included
direct and thus is not eligble to such a check.
To avoid checking these we can say in Kbuild:
ignore-y += compiler-gcc.h
This tells headercheck to ignore compiler-gcc.h when performing
the headercheck.
The current implementation leaves a lot of .c files.
I will address this if the concept is considered acceptable.
To visit all relevant directories we need to adjust the Kbuild
files but that can wait until we have the current pile fixed.
Likewise it does not support arch specific include files.
That can wait too.
I have tried running headercheck on an i386 defconfig and
the result shows that a lot af headers does not include there
dependencies.
The numbers (including sub-directories):
25 include/asm-generic
12 include/drm
282 include/linux
2 include/mtd
24 include/sound
12 include/video
Remember we do not visit all directories - only those listed in include/Kbuild.
To try it yourself apply following patch and on a configured kernel use:
make -k headercheck
Looking at the errors I would assume that at least 75% of the errors
can be fixed in one day but the rest may be a bit more troublesome.
The open question is if this is worthwhile?
Sam
From a88159a3bcbae4e5748d25f71d761c142d89c85d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:56:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] kbuild: add headercheck
headercheck is used to check if all headerfiles include the
files that is needed for a headerfile to build.
It visits all directories listed in include/Kbuild using header-y.
And for each header file it creates a .c file that is then build.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
---
Makefile | 6 +++++
include/linux/Kbuild | 7 ++++++
| 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 scripts/Kbuild.headercheck
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e5ad5fd..39ed688 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -837,6 +837,9 @@ vmlinux: $(vmlinux-lds) $(vmlinux-init) $(vmlinux-main) vmlinux.o $(kallsyms.o)
ifdef CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK
$(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile headers_check
endif
+ifndef CONFIG_INCLUDE_HEADER_CHECK
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck obj=include
+endif
ifdef CONFIG_SAMPLES
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=samples
endif
@@ -1463,6 +1466,9 @@ namespacecheck:
export_report:
$(PERL) $(srctree)/scripts/export_report.pl
+headercheck:
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck obj=include
+
endif #ifeq ($(config-targets),1)
endif #ifeq ($(mixed-targets),1)
diff --git a/include/linux/Kbuild b/include/linux/Kbuild
index ca9b9b9..49b61ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/Kbuild
+++ b/include/linux/Kbuild
@@ -375,3 +375,10 @@ unifdef-y += xfrm.h
objhdr-y += version.h
header-y += wimax.h
header-y += wimax/
+
+# header files that cannot be build alone
+# (not checked by make headercheck)
+ignore-y += compiler-intel.h
+ignore-y += compiler-gcc.h
+ignore-y += compiler-gcc3.h
+ignore-y += compiler-gcc4.h
--git a/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck b/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9701341
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# ==========================================================================
+# Check that the header files include all files needed for them to build
+# without errors
+#
+# The Kbuild files used for specifying exported header files are used
+# to tell what headerfile to check.
+#
+# header-y - used to tell what directories to visit
+# ignore-y - list files we should not check
+#
+# ==========================================================================
+
+.PHONY: __headercheck
+__headercheck:
+
+include scripts/Kbuild.include
+
+kbuild-file := $(srctree)/$(obj)/Kbuild
+include $(kbuild-file)
+
+include $(srctree)/scripts/Makefile.lib
+
+headers := $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(obj)/*.h)
+ignores := $(addprefix $(srctree)/$(obj)/,$(ignore-y))
+headers := $(filter-out $(ignores), $(headers))
+headers := $(sort $(headers))
+
+subdirs := $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, $(header-y)))
+
+o_files := $(addsuffix .o, $(headers))
+
+__headercheck: $(subdirs) $(o_files)
+ echo $^
+
+
+include_name = $(subst $(srctree)/include/,,$<)
+
+$(o_files): %.h.o : %.h
+ $(Q)echo "#include <$(include_name)>" > $(@:.o=.c)
+ $(Q)$(CC) $(c_flags) -c -o $@ $<
+
+
+.PHONY: $(subdirs)
+$(subdirs):
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/scripts/Kbuild.headercheck obj=$(obj)/$@
+
--
1.6.0.2.GIT
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files
2009-04-09 20:42 [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files Sam Ravnborg
@ 2009-04-10 3:28 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-10 5:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-10 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-04-10 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: linux-kbuild, LKML, Ingo Molnar
Hello Sam,
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 22:42 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> We have at several occasions discussed if our header files
> should include their dependencies or not.
>
> But we were lacking a tool to tell us if our header files
> included the headerfiles they needed or not.
>
> headercheck can be used to do so.
>
> headercheck use the existing Kbuild files in
> include/ to determine which directories to visit.
>
> And for each directory it create one .c file for each
> .h file and build it.
>
> A .c file looks like this:
>
> $cat module.h.c
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
Is it possible to check that which header files are included in source
file.
I mean how many header files are included for kernel/module.c and in
which order and we can also check that same file is requested how many
times, like:
linux/module.h (requested count, included or not)
+linux/list.h
++linux/stddef.h
and so on.
Thanks,
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files
2009-04-10 3:28 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-04-10 5:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2009-04-10 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput; +Cc: linux-kbuild, LKML, Ingo Molnar
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:58:20AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 22:42 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > We have at several occasions discussed if our header files
> > should include their dependencies or not.
> >
> > But we were lacking a tool to tell us if our header files
> > included the headerfiles they needed or not.
> >
> > headercheck can be used to do so.
> >
> > headercheck use the existing Kbuild files in
> > include/ to determine which directories to visit.
> >
> > And for each directory it create one .c file for each
> > .h file and build it.
> >
> > A .c file looks like this:
> >
> > $cat module.h.c
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> >
>
> Is it possible to check that which header files are included in source
> file.
>
> I mean how many header files are included for kernel/module.c and in
> which order and we can also check that same file is requested how many
> times, like:
>
> linux/module.h (requested count, included or not)
> +linux/list.h
> ++linux/stddef.h
Try to take a look at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rayl/headergraphs/
and
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/hviz
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files
2009-04-09 20:42 [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-10 3:28 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-04-10 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-04-10 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: linux-kbuild, LKML
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> We have at several occasions discussed if our header files
> should include their dependencies or not.
>
> But we were lacking a tool to tell us if our header files
> included the headerfiles they needed or not.
>
> headercheck can be used to do so.
>
> headercheck use the existing Kbuild files in
> include/ to determine which directories to visit.
>
> And for each directory it create one .c file for each
> .h file and build it.
>
> A .c file looks like this:
>
> $cat module.h.c
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
>
> Building this file will tell us if module.h is
> missing any dependencies (but NOT if it has too many) with
> the current configuration.
>
> We know that some header files are simply NOT supposed to be included
> direct and thus is not eligble to such a check.
>
> To avoid checking these we can say in Kbuild:
>
> ignore-y += compiler-gcc.h
>
> This tells headercheck to ignore compiler-gcc.h when performing
> the headercheck.
>
> The current implementation leaves a lot of .c files.
> I will address this if the concept is considered acceptable.
>
> To visit all relevant directories we need to adjust the Kbuild
> files but that can wait until we have the current pile fixed.
> Likewise it does not support arch specific include files.
> That can wait too.
>
> I have tried running headercheck on an i386 defconfig and
> the result shows that a lot af headers does not include there
> dependencies.
>
> The numbers (including sub-directories):
>
> 25 include/asm-generic
> 12 include/drm
> 282 include/linux
> 2 include/mtd
> 24 include/sound
> 12 include/video
>
> Remember we do not visit all directories - only those listed in include/Kbuild.
>
> To try it yourself apply following patch and on a configured kernel use:
>
> make -k headercheck
>
> Looking at the errors I would assume that at least 75% of the errors
> can be fixed in one day but the rest may be a bit more troublesome.
>
> The open question is if this is worthwhile?
Definitely a good idea IMHO. The current practice of 'include enough
.h files in the .c file to make it build' has resulted in perversely
long #include line sections in .c files.
For example arch/x86/kernel/setup.c has 76 headers (!) at the
moment, and you have to go down 4 pages in the file before you see
the first line of substantial code.
Or arch/x86/mm/fault.c had 32 headers - i recently cut that down to
11 only.
Nice would be to have a tool that lists the minimum set of required
headers for any given .c file, for a current .config. If we run that
in allyesconfig we get a pretty good approximation of the headers
needed.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-10 12:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-09 20:42 [ANNOUNCE] headercheck - check dependencies on header files Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-10 3:28 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-10 5:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-10 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox