From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: strange behaviour from "make localmodconfig" throws out ath9k stuff
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:02:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367244174.28120.3.camel@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130428202854.GC4571@free.fr>
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 22:28 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Robert, All,
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 02:19:05PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm going to take a wild, uneducated stab at this, but it matches
> > what i was starting to suspect, anyway. this has nothing to do with
> > config processing, it has to do specifically with how the Kconfig
> > entries related to atheros cards were changed.
> >
> > here's the important part:
> >
> > $ git show 23c1d7f
> > ... snip ...
> > So, this patch introduce new Kconfig variable ATH_CARDS for belonging
> > to the "Atheros Wireless Cards" family; while ATH_COMMON becomes hidden
> > variable to express dependency on common Atheros code in ath.ko. Modules
> > that depend on this common code now express it by setting ATH_COMMON.
> > ... snip ...
> > -menuconfig ATH_COMMON
> > +config ATH_COMMON
> > + tristate
> > +
> > +menuconfig ATH_CARDS
> >
> > in short, a new variable, ATH_CARDS, was introduced that doesn't
> > appear in the earlier .config so, unsurprisingly, when you run "make
> > oldconfig", in the midst of all of the other manual answers, you have
> > to specify what you want done, and look at the default:
> >
> > $ make oldconfig
> > ... many manual choices ...
> > Atheros Wireless Cards (ATH_CARDS) [N/m/?] (NEW) <-- there's the culprit
> > ... snip ...
> >
> > so running the standard "yes '' | make oldconfig" is going to
> > deselect what looks like almost all ath9k-related stuff, simply
> > because a new, low-level dependency variable was introduced.
> >
> > am i making sense here?
>
> Not sure how streamline_config,pl should behave. Cc-ing Steven as the
> original author, maybe he has a better understanding on this situation.
Running an older config on a newer kernel can have strange effects,
although I do that all the time. I just expect the strange effects and
fix them when they occur.
Looks like the above is one of the strange effects that need a manual
fix. localmodconfig will not enable anything that wasn't enabled in the
original config. If a new dependency is added by a newer kernel then you
need to run an make oldconfig and make sure you have everything before
doing a localmodconfig. Otherwise, you may lose a module.
Hmm, I may be able to have localmodconfig warn if it can not satisfy a
module.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-29 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-26 19:05 strange behaviour from "make localmodconfig" throws out ath9k stuff Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-26 19:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-27 0:47 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-27 15:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-27 17:30 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-27 17:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-27 17:48 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-27 18:19 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-28 20:28 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-29 10:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 14:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 15:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 15:19 ` Robert P. J. Day
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304291121180.26536@oneiric>
2013-04-29 16:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 18:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 18:26 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 18:41 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 19:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 20:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 20:50 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 20:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-04-29 23:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-29 14:02 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-04-27 17:47 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367244174.28120.3.camel@fedora \
--to=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox