public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>
Cc: yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation in expr.c
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:10:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412669443.18874.16.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411405999-20212-2-git-send-email-walch.martin@web.de>

On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 19:13 +0200, Martin Walch wrote:
> expr_eliminate_dups2() in scripts/kconfig/expr.c applies two bad
> inference rules:
> 
> (FOO || BAR) && (!FOO && !BAR) -> n
> (FOO && BAR) || (!FOO || !BAR) -> y
> 
> They would be correct in propositional logic, but this is a three-valued
> logic, and here it is wrong in that it changes semantics. It becomes
> immediately visible when substituting FOO and BAR with m.

Well, not to me. When I apply the rules under "Menu dependencies" in
Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt, in embarrassingly small
steps, I get:
    (m || m) && (!m && !m) ->
    (1 || 1) && ((2 - 1) && (2 - 1)) ->
    (1 || 1) && (1 && 1) ->
    max(1, 1) && min(1, 1) ->
    1 && 1 ->
    min(1, 1) ->
    1 -> m

and
    (m && m) || (!m || !m) ->
    (1 && 1) || ((2 - 1) || (2 - 1)) ->
    (1 && 1) || (1 || 1) ->
    min(1, 1) || max(1, 1) ->
    1 || 1 ->
    max(1, 1) ->
    1 -> m

Did I do that right? Anyway, perhaps you'd like to add a line or two how
these two expressions actually evaluate when FOO and BAR are m.

> Fix it by removing expr_eliminate_dups2() and the functions that have no use
> anywhere else: expr_extract_eq_and(), expr_extract_eq_or(),
> and expr_extract_eq() from scripts/kconfig/expr.[ch]
> 
> Currently the bug is not triggered in mainline, so this patch does not modify
> the configuration space there.
> 
> As a side effect, this reduces code size in expr.c by roughly 10% and slightly
> improves startup time for all configuration frontends.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>

Does Yann still care about Kconfig? Yann has been rather quiet for a
while now.


Paul Bolle


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-10 14:31 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] kconfig: Remove bad inference rules expr_eliminate_dups2() Martin Walch
2014-09-22 17:13 ` [Resending PATCH v2 0/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation Martin Walch
2014-09-22 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kconfig: fix bad syntactic transformation in expr.c Martin Walch
2014-10-07  8:10     ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-10-07  9:21       ` Dirk Gouders
2014-10-11  0:20         ` Martin Walch
2014-10-11 19:07     ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-22 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kconfig: trivial - adjust comments Martin Walch
2014-10-10 13:01     ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1412669443.18874.16.camel@x220 \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=walch.martin@web.de \
    --cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox