From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.15]:50219 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751365AbaKFK2j (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:28:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1415269716.4390.6.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: don't silently ignore unhandled characters From: Paul Bolle Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:28:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <545B59540200007800045446@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <5458A4FC0200007800044AC1@mail.emea.novell.com> <1415110006.20372.165.camel@x220> <5458ED470200007800044DA7@mail.emea.novell.com> <1415183789.20372.243.camel@x220> <545B59540200007800045446@mail.emea.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jan Beulich Cc: yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 10:19 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > Again - this is code that gets generated by flex, and hence > dropping it (entirely, or the hunk that changes it) will make the > discussion re-appear the next time someone re-generates the > file. My public note ended with: > I personally wouldn't bother to add this hunk, but who cares. I guess it wasn't clear that this meant that I think that the discussion, which I started of course, is basically moot. Paul Bolle