From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.14]:58834 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755780AbaLHSvE (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:51:04 -0500 Message-ID: <1418064660.2058.11.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean' From: Paul Bolle Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:51:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1539c3778a0f3533942f69540a9b5b3d1f965bdc.1418003065.git.cj@linux.com> References: <1539c3778a0f3533942f69540a9b5b3d1f965bdc.1418003065.git.cj@linux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Jaeger Cc: yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 20:49 -0500, Christoph Jaeger wrote: > Having an undocumented alias for type definitions of boolean config options is > more confusing than helpful. Remove support for the keyword 'boolean' in favor > of 'bool' and convert all its users. > > While at it, fix some minor grammar issues in warning messages. > > Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann > Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger This doesn't apply on next-20141208. What tree did you base this on? Thanks, Paul Bolle