From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:52889 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbaLHTOD (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:14:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1418066039.2058.19.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean' From: Paul Bolle Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:13:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1418064660.2058.11.camel@x220> References: <1539c3778a0f3533942f69540a9b5b3d1f965bdc.1418003065.git.cj@linux.com> <1418064660.2058.11.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Jaeger Cc: yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:51 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > This doesn't apply on next-20141208. What tree did you base this on? I got it to apply on next-20141208 by dropping the hunk for arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/Kconfig and by making (trivial) context changes to the hunks for init/Kconfig and net/Kconfig. (My experience with actual maintainers is that they won't bother to do that. Anyhow, Kconfig is basically unmaintained. And I don't know which tree one should base ones Kconfig patches on.) I'll muddle along... Paul Bolle