From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.5]:62689 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbaLTKO5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:14:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1419070495.26428.15.camel@x220> Subject: Re: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mkcapflags.sh From: Paul Bolle Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:14:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20141219174330.GC2286@localhost.localdomain> References: <20141219174330.GC2286@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sylvain BERTRAND Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Sylvain, Why did you send this to linux-kbuild? It seems this is only interesting to the people (and lists) found with scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mkcapflags.sh On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 18:43 +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > line 30: > [ "$VALUE" == '""' ] && continue > > should be > > [ "$VALUE" = '""' ] && continue If you resend this to the x86 people you might want to add an _explanation_ for that suggestion. And the chances of someone looking at it increase if you submit it as a proper patch. Paul Bolle