* defconfigs size reduction?
@ 2008-02-03 12:29 devzero
2008-02-06 21:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: devzero @ 2008-02-03 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kbuild
hi there,
i found that there are a lot of deconfigs bundled with every kernel-release. (about 335 on my suse box)
summed up, that`s 6,3M and 311 KLOC (Kilo Lines of Configuration :)
i think, that`s quite a lot.
if i strip the comments ( real comments and "# CONFIGOPT is not set") and the blank lines from that, the size reduces to 1.9M and 86 KLOC.
i have tested such stripping with arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig and if i do a "make defconfig" afterwards, the .config in /usr/src/linux
has those comments and the blank lines again.
so it appears, that these defconfigs have lot`s of redundant information which could probably be wiped with a bigger cleanup patch.
i`m not sure, if this is a good approach, because others may use the configs in a different way or it may work differently for other arches.
maybe you experts can give a comment here ?
would such cleanup for shrinking kernelsize be reasonable ?
regards
roland
_________________________________________________________________________
In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten!
Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: defconfigs size reduction?
2008-02-03 12:29 defconfigs size reduction? devzero
@ 2008-02-06 21:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-02-06 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devzero; +Cc: linux-kbuild
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:29:00PM +0100, devzero@web.de wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i found that there are a lot of deconfigs bundled with every kernel-release. (about 335 on my suse box)
>
> summed up, that`s 6,3M and 311 KLOC (Kilo Lines of Configuration :)
>
> i think, that`s quite a lot.
>
> if i strip the comments ( real comments and "# CONFIGOPT is not set") and the blank lines from that, the size reduces to 1.9M and 86 KLOC.
>
The primary issue with defconfigs are that they get
outdated rather quickly. They are often several kernel releases
behind.
This is a much more relvant issue to address than a few wasted MB of
cheap disk space.
So anything that just make it a tad more difficult to update
a defconfig will not be accepted if the only aim is to save
disk space.
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-06 21:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-03 12:29 defconfigs size reduction? devzero
2008-02-06 21:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox