From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@fau.de>
Cc: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@einserver.de>,
Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Print full defined and depends for multiply-defined symbols
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:56:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428778617.17822.133.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABv5NL_uwXv=wNm7h7u_Y1FW5EsqVDdTcB6_dDXemVuVvEbCmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 18:36 +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote:
> If you're reading the dependency list as "what do i have to enable to
> be able to choose a value for FRAME_POINTER" and think, THUMB2_KERNEL
> would be a good choice to leave disabled, you're going to have a bad
> time.
> (The second definition in arm/Kconfig.debug doesn't have a prompt and
> the default has additional conditions)
Please elaborate on "bad time".
> I personally would prefer to
> additionally find the second definition that doesn't a prompt and
> other dependencies instead of adding them to the first entry, but
> that's just my personal preference.
I notice myself getting rather grumpy. (That usually translates to:
"Drop it, and revisit in a few days".) Let me explain.
This is the arm64 entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool
default y
This is the hexagon entry
config FRAME_POINTER
def_bool y
This is the m32r entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
help
If you say Y here [...]
And this is the sparc entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool
depends on MCOUNT
default y
You'd expect these entries to yield really simple results when doing a
search in menuconfig. But the results show unparseable crap[1]. (And I'm
afraid Gregory's patch would make that even worse. Gregory: please prove
me wrong.)
So to the grumpy me it looks like either:
- menuconfig handles these redefinitions incorrectly in its UI;
- these redefinitions are actually complicated (as in: somehow they
concatenate the dependencies, etc.) and we should probably disallow
them. Because otherwise looking at a Kconfig entry tells you very little
about what is actually going on for the architecture you're interested
in.
What is the grumpy me missing here?
Paul Bolle
[1] The hexagon entry is interesting, probably because it sources
lib/Kconfig.debug _after_ it defined FRAME_POINTER for itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-11 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 23:56 [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Print full defined and depends for multiply-defined symbols Gregory Fong
2015-04-08 23:59 ` Gregory Fong
2015-04-10 21:25 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-11 16:36 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-11 18:56 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-04-11 19:58 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-11 20:23 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-11 21:46 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-11 22:25 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-12 15:02 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-13 1:06 ` Gregory Fong
2015-04-13 7:51 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-13 14:57 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-13 16:04 ` Stefan Hengelein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428778617.17822.133.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rupran@einserver.de \
--cc=stefan.hengelein@fau.de \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
--cc=walch.martin@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox