From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builddeb: fix stripped module signatures if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL are set
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 19:22:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430763762.4113.173.camel@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504153724.GA26392@nest>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 18:37 +0300, Andrey Skvortsov wrote:
> On 22 Apr, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:58:48PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > > (added Max to Cc)
> > >
> > > On 2015-03-16 09:20, Andrey Skvortsov wrote:
> > > > If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL is set, then user expects that all modules are
> > > > automatically signed in the result package, as it's for rpm-pkg, binrpm-pkg,
> > > > tar, tar-*. For deb-pkg this is correct only if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
> > > > is NOT set. In that case deb-package contains signed modules.
> > > >
> > > > But if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is set, builddeb creates separate package with
> > > > debug information. To do that, debug information from all modules
> > > > is copied into separate files by objcopy. And loadable kernel modules are
> > > > stripped afterwards. Stripping removes previously (during modules_install)
> > > > added signatures from loadable kernel modules. Therefore final deb-package
> > > > contains unsigned modules despite of set option CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL.
> > > >
> > > > This patch resigns all stripped modules if CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL is set
> > > > to solve this problem.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Max, Ben, are you fine with this patch? It looks OK to me, the
> > > modules_sign target has been added for this very purpose.
> > >
> >
> > Ben seems busy with the release, so jumping in. The patch looks
> > perfect to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
> >
> Maximilian, thanks for the review.
>
> Michal, are we waiting for Ben's acknowledge too?
Don't wait for me.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 8:20 [PATCH] builddeb: fix stripped module signatures if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL are set Andrey Skvortsov
2015-04-21 13:58 ` Michal Marek
2015-04-22 15:57 ` maximilian attems
2015-05-04 15:37 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2015-05-04 18:22 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2015-05-06 13:30 ` Michal Marek
2015-05-08 11:11 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2015-05-08 13:47 ` maximilian attems
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430763762.4113.173.camel@decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max@stro.at \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox