From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.22]:44566 "EHLO lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751960AbbGBJpQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 05:45:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1435830314.2423.16.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: kconfig xconfig port to Qt 5 From: Paul Bolle Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:45:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1462835.V8cvkXcCv0@tjmaciei-mobl4> References: <1462835.V8cvkXcCv0@tjmaciei-mobl4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thiago Macieira Cc: Boris Barbulovski , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org [Yann has disappeared. But you couldn't know that.] On zo, 2015-06-28 at 18:44 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > First things first: the MAINTAINERS file lists > git://gitorious.org/linux-kconfig/linux-kconfig as the repository for > upstream > sources, but Gitorious is no longer working and that is unavailable. > Do you > have an updated URL? I'm guessing the current development tree is found in the kconfig branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmarek/kbuild.git > Second: how do you prefer these changes? Boris made 37 commits, each > making a > small part of the port. Do you want each change individually, or would > you > like me to squash them? Probably the easiest way to get an answer to that question is to submit the series (in as many patches as you think are actually needed) and see how people react. Hope this helps, Paul Bolle