From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@fau.de>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@fau.de>,
linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: Kconfig: '+config' valid syntax?
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:59:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435913987.2423.38.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55963AD7.3040905@fau.de>
On vr, 2015-07-03 at 09:33 +0200, Andreas Ruprecht wrote:
> I tested the behaviour on yesterday's linux-next, but the commit
> mentioned above will only complain for invalid characters inside the
> PARAM case and not for COMMANDs. So, as an example, if you write
> something like
>
> config ACPI_REV_OVERRIDE_POSSIBLE
> depends on X86 +
> [...]
>
> Kconfig will complain about the '+'. This, however, does not apply for
> top-level statements like 'config', 'menuconfig', and so on.
Which might explain why this silly mistake went unnoticed. (And, as I
think you implied, it doesn't help that the empty rule we're hitting
here is not commented.)
So the naive solution seems to be to also add the warning to COMMAND's
rule for '.'. A quick test suggest that would work. Am I missing some
obvious downside with that solution?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-02 8:08 Kconfig: '+config' valid syntax? Valentin Rothberg
2015-07-02 9:01 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-02 9:25 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-02 11:57 ` Andreas Ruprecht
2015-07-02 12:10 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-03 7:33 ` Andreas Ruprecht
2015-07-03 8:59 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-07-03 9:29 ` Andreas Ruprecht
2015-07-03 10:46 ` Ulf Magnusson
2015-07-03 10:51 ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-07-03 10:56 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-07-03 11:11 ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-07-03 11:34 ` Ulf Magnusson
2015-07-03 11:00 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-03 11:33 ` Andreas Ruprecht
2015-07-03 11:40 ` Ulf Magnusson
2015-07-03 12:39 ` Ulf Magnusson
2015-07-03 12:48 ` Ulf Magnusson
2015-07-03 11:58 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-03 10:52 ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-02 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-03 10:16 ` Ulf Magnusson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435913987.2423.38.camel@tiscali.nl \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=andreas.ruprecht@fau.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stefan.hengelein@fau.de \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox