From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.30]:60460 "EHLO lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755158AbbGCL64 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 07:58:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1435924733.17390.9.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: Kconfig: '+config' valid syntax? From: Paul Bolle Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:58:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5596731F.20309@fau.de> References: <1435827662.2423.4.camel@tiscali.nl> <55952723.80801@fau.de> <1435839005.2423.28.camel@tiscali.nl> <55963AD7.3040905@fau.de> <1435913987.2423.38.camel@tiscali.nl> <559655E3.6010400@fau.de> <5596731F.20309@fau.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andreas Ruprecht , Ulf Magnusson Cc: Valentin Rothberg , rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Mailing List , hengelein Stefan , linux@dominikbrodowski.net On vr, 2015-07-03 at 13:33 +0200, Andreas Ruprecht wrote: > Unfortunately, when I generate the zconf.{hash,lex,tab}.c files on my > machine, they have some notable differences to the _shipped versions: > > ruprecht@box:linux-next$ diff -u zconf.tab.c zconf.tab.c_shipped > - return yyresult; > + /* Make sure YYID is used. */ > + return YYID (yyresult); Different version of bison? > and I can't find any Documentation on how to properly rebuild the > _shipped files... Does anybody have a hint on that? One of my many, many pet peeves: patches touching _shipped files like these should mention the command line that was used. Because now everyone is expected to figure that out themselves. Bonus points for mentioning the version of the tool that was used. Paul Bolle