From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.248]:30124 "EHLO ag-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbYAFO0T (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:26:19 -0500 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 23so1802178agd.10 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:26:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:26:06 +0800 From: WANG Cong Subject: Re: Kbuild update Message-ID: <20080106142606.GB2528@hacking> Reply-To: WANG Cong References: <20080103213255.GA21811@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080104132316.GA2485@hacking> <20080104143953.GA30536@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080105054840.GB9976@does.not.exist> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080105054840.GB9976@does.not.exist> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Sam Ravnborg , WANG Cong , linux-kbuild , LKML >> It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. >> What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to >> see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel >> for a number of languages. >> >> One criteria to get a .po file integrated could be at least 10% of the >> strings translated or similar. Well, I think it's worthy. The translation effort will be valuable and much helpful for non-English-speaking peoples. > >Besides the initial translation efforts a big problem would be to >also find people who will regularly update the translations for >many years. > Yes, that's really a problem. But I think the updates won't be too frequent, only update for stable release is enough. If we can make this to be an offical project for Linux kernel, I think it won't be a big problem. Regards. Cong