From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:43922 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757175AbYD3Riy (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:38:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:38:37 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: "Anyone who likes complexity and fuzzy logic" (Re: [PATCH] headerdep:...) Message-ID: <20080430173837.GP14976@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080426134554.GA20727@damson.getinternet.no> <20080426161714.GR14990@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oleg Verych Cc: Vegard Nossum , Sam Ravnborg , Pekka Enberg , Adrian Bunk , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:57:16PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > Why? Why GNU C compiler developers didn't do such (obviously useful) > tool? C compiler (some part of it) *is* responsible for parsing, > tokenizing, etc. Why there is development of never-ending buggy > optimizations only[0]? Shut up. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."