public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 12:53:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080524125316.4b969936.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080524192540.GA28067@uranus.ravnborg.org>

On Sat, 24 May 2008 21:25:40 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:

> We have many places in the kernel that looks like
> the following:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_FOO
> 	...
> #endif
> 
> Which has the disadvantage that the code denoted '...'
> are not even built if CONFIG_FOO is not selected in
> the current configuration.
> 
> We know that gcc do simple code-elimination for
> conditionals which is always true/false and
> thus the above code could be turned into:
> 
> 	if (CONFIG_FOO)
> 		...
> 
> One line smaller and we follow the normal flow in the program.
> The code is always build but we do not waste space as gcc will
> do proper code-elimination for us.
> 
> Today this is not possible because kconfig will only
> define CONFIG_FOO if selected and FOO is not a module.
> 
> The following patch implement a new set of defines in
> the KCONFIG_* namespace.
> 
> For a tristate symbol the following are defined:
> 
> FOO not selected: 
> #define KCONFIG_FOO        0
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 0
> 
> FOO is built-in ('y')
> #define KCONFIG_FOO        1
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 0
> 
> FOO is a module ('m'):
> #define KCONFIG_FOO        1
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 1
> 
> In other words KCONFIG_FOO will say if the
> symbol is selected and KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE
> will say if it is a module.
> 
> With the above included we can now do:
> 
> 	if (KCONFIG_FOO)
> 		...
> 
> This is not a replacement for the CONFIG_*
> defines but a pleasant supplement.
> Using KCONFIG_FOO will also give us a nice
> error message the day that FOO is no longer part
> of the configuration.

It could help to get us out of the occasional sticky situation, but it
does seem a bit risky.  What happens with Kconfig variables which are
just not known about at all with some .configs?

Silly example, one could add

	if (KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820)

to kernel/sched.c and that would work happily until someone sets DVB=n,
in which case I assume KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 doesn't get defined
anywhere?

A more realistic example might be using an x86-only KCONFIG_* in non-x86
code.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-24 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-24 19:25 [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 19:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-24 20:14   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:46     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:56       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:03         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:24   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:48     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-24 21:00       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 20:44   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-24 20:37   ` [PATCH] x86: use defconfig as last resort Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-25  1:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-25  6:15       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-25  6:22       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:48 ` [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:58   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:03     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 21:13       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:26 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080524125316.4b969936.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox