public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 13:48:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080524134815.116feb9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080524202427.GA879@uranus.ravnborg.org>

On Sat, 24 May 2008 22:24:27 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:

> > It could help to get us out of the occasional sticky situation, but it
> > does seem a bit risky.  What happens with Kconfig variables which are
> > just not known about at all with some .configs?
> > 
> > Silly example, one could add
> > 
> > 	if (KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820)
> > 
> > to kernel/sched.c and that would work happily until someone sets DVB=n,
> > in which case I assume KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 doesn't get defined
> > anywhere?
> It would have helped if I had applied the correct patch...
> All boolean and tristate symbols in the konfiguration have
> their symbols defined as KCONFIG_* no matter their values.
> So KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 would get defined.

But there are still holes - KCONFIG_ARCH_FOOTBRIDGE wouldn't be defined
on x86, for example.  Anything which is inside an `if' or inside an
if/source/endif will not be known about?  I assume?

It's all probably not a big problem in practice - we'd need to be
more-than-usually-silly to trip over things like this.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-24 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-24 19:25 [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-24 20:14   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:46     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:56       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:03         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:24   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:48     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-24 21:00       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 20:44   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-24 20:37   ` [PATCH] x86: use defconfig as last resort Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-25  1:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-25  6:15       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-25  6:22       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 20:48 ` [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:58   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:03     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 21:13       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 21:26 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080524134815.116feb9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox