From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
zippel@linux-m68k.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Better way to force a rebuild
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:02:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081210200242.GA15692@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812101443550.11805@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:48:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In include/linux/kernel.h I currently have the following lines at the
> bottom of the file:
>
> /* Rebuild everything on CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD */
> #ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> # define REBUILD_DUE_TO_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> #endif
>
>
> This is only there to force a rebuild of all files when
> CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD is modified. Since the modification of that
> config causes the build to act different, we need to rebuild all C
> objects. I added the #ifdef in kernel.h as a hack to force the rebuild by
> the config dependencies used in kbuild.
>
> My question is, is there a better way to force a full rebuild on a
> modification of a config?
Why is that hack required in the first place?
We rebuild if:
- target file is missing (not the case here)
- any prerequisite files are newer than target (not the case here)
- any CONFIG_* options used by any prerequisite has changed (not the case here)
[It is due to your hack]
- gcc changed (not the case here)
- options are added/deleted to gcc (this should be the case for relevant files)
Looking a bit deeper into this.
I see that we have in Makefile.build:
define rule_cc_o_c
$(call echo-cmd,checksrc) $(cmd_checksrc) \
$(call echo-cmd,cc_o_c) $(cmd_cc_o_c); \
$(cmd_modversions) \
$(cmd_record_mcount)
So you want everyting to be rebuild if the command above changes.
That should be doable - and it is indeed a bug that we do not do so.
The integration of record_mcount needs to be improved.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 19:48 Better way to force a rebuild Steven Rostedt
2008-12-10 20:02 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-12-10 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-10 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-10 20:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-10 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-10 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-10 20:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-10 20:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-10 21:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-13 23:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-14 17:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-16 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081210200242.GA15692@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox