From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpsmtpm-eml102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.6]:57314 "EHLO CPSMTPM-EML102.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753328AbZKEAa5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:30:57 -0500 From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: [PATCH] deb-pkg: Make deb-pkg generate a seperate linux-libc-dev deb Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:31:01 +0100 References: <1257373849-25557-1-git-send-email-max@stro.at> <200911050020.00291.elendil@planet.nl> <20091104234023.GJ29378@baikonur.stro.at> In-Reply-To: <20091104234023.GJ29378@baikonur.stro.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911050131.02305.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: maximilian attems Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org On Thursday 05 November 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:19:59AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > maximilian attems wrote: > > > userland dev likes latest incarnation of that userland API. > > > make it easy to also build it on make deb-pkg invocation: > > > > I would very much prefer it if this was either optional or a separate > > target. I have personally never had any need for such a package and > > would like to be able to not build it. > > > > I agree it should be possible, just not forced. > > so what you propose a bindeb-pkg target for the linux-image only? Yep, that would be fine as a solution and consistent with the targets for rpm. Probably bindeb-pkg should do image + firmware though? > there is clearly demand for linux-source and linux-headers packages > build out of deb-pkg. No disagreement with that. Cheers, FJP